Judge denies request to stop pipe closure

BISMARCK, N.D. — A federal judge rejected a request from the operator of the Dakota Access pipeline to halt an order to shut down the oil pipeline during a lengthy environmental review.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg denied the company’s request Thursday, effectively sending the case to a panel of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Boasberg on Monday ordered the pipeline shut down by Aug. 5 for an additional environmental assessment more than three years after it began pumping oil. The move was a victory for the Standing Rock Sioux and a blow to President Donald Trump’s efforts to weaken the public health and environmental protections his administration views as obstacles to businesses.

In arguing against the closure, pipeline operator Energy Transfer estimated it would take three months to empty the pipe of oil and complete steps to preserve it for future use, the Bismarck Tribune reported.

The Texas-based company says to keep the line from corroding without the flow of oil, it must be filled with an inert gas, such as nitrogen.

Todd Stamm, Energy Transfer’s Vice President of Crude and Liquid Operations, wrote in a court filing that, while the equipment that causes oil to flow through the line could be shut off by the judge’s deadline, “it is not physically possible to ‘empty it of oil’ in the thirty days provided by the order.”

The line must undergo a “purge-and-fill process” that involves draining segments one at a time while the pipeline is operating to replace the oil with nitrogen, Stamm wrote.

Energy Transfer estimated it would cost $24 million to empty the oil and take steps to preserve the pipe. The company says to maintain the line, it would spend an additional $67.5 million each year it remains inoperable.

The pipeline holds about 5 million barrels of oil when full.