Indoor crowds upset Fauci, but he says the crisis will not last
Arts reporter Geoff Edgers hosts the Washington Post’s first Instagram Live show from his barn in Concord, Mass.
Recently, Edgers chatted with Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Here are some excerpts from their conversation.
Q: Does it drive you nuts when you see photos of people crowded outside, like at the beach or a motorcycle rally? Does it make your blood boil?
A: The answer, Geoff, is yes. But my blood evaporates when I see people indoors in a bar or in a crowded area. It’s worse being indoors in a crowd without a mask, with poor ventilation, because outdoors is always better than indoors.
Q: Another thing that’s really been on everyone’s mind is how to send kids back to school. Tell me your views on that.
A: It really depends. First of all, I think it’s important for people to understand that college is different than elementary school because you have people coming in from all different parts of the country. In general, when you’re talking about schools, it depends on the location you’re talking about at the state, city and county level.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention comes out with the designation of green, yellow, red. If you are in a green zone, in general, there is a good degree of impunity, because of a lower risk of getting infected. If you’re in a red zone, then you really have to think twice about whether it’s prudent to bring the children back to school. If you’re in a yellow one, you should have a plan: Can you safeguard the health, the safety and the welfare of the children and the teachers? What do you do when a child gets infected? Do you have maskwearing? Do you have the degree of physical separation? How long can you do outdoor classes? And what classes can you do outdoors? Can you keep children segregated when they’re outside playing? Because groups together are the things that do it, particularly indoors. So always remember outdoors, always better than indoors. Masks are very helpful.
Q: I don’t know if you Google yourself or look on eBay, but is it strange to you that you’re a scientist and yet you’ve become kind of a folk hero?
A: Well, you know, I actually don’t pay attention to that because that could really be distracting. And I don’t pay attention to the death threats and the harassments either. So, yeah. We live in an extraordinary society where public health issues become so politicized and divisive that when you start talking about prudent things to do to preserve the public health, that’s actually considered by some, hopefully a really small minority, as something worthy of threatening you. I mean, that really is bizarre.
Q: And you can’t always know everything, right?
A: Yeah. Science is an iterative, self-correcting process. When you’re involved with a static situation that doesn’t change, then the scientific facts and what you use as evidence to make decisions and policy recommendations shouldn’t change much at all. But when you’re dealing with a moving target, an evolving pandemic with which we’ve never had any prior experience, you’ve got to make decisions and recommendations based on the data and the evidence that you have at any given time. But as the situation evolves, so too will the evidence. So too will the data. And you need to be humble enough and flexible enough to change things based on what the latest data and evidence are. That is interpreted by some people as “Science is wrong, they’re changing their minds, they’re fooling us.” No. What you’re doing is you’re being flexible enough as you learn more and more to make the data and the evidence drive your recommendations.
Q: You hear all these stories about somebody who’s had it: “Oh, I’m fine.” I mean, my 99year-old grandmother had it, showed no symptoms and was OK. But then you hear this heartbreaking story about a 35-year-old in perfect health who doesn’t make it or takes months and months to recover. Why are there so many variables in how people respond to the virus?
A: That’s the most important question, because it’s at the root of the misunderstanding, the real misunderstanding about this virus. So, as you know, I’ve been chasing viruses, as it were, and responding to outbreaks now for almost 40 years, right from the beginning of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, through pandemic flu, Ebola, Zika, anthrax, all that. This is the only pathogen I’ve ever seen that has such a wide range of manifestations that you have to scratch your head.
Q: We haven’t spoken about voting. Do you plan to vote in person or mail in your ballot?
A: I likely will vote in person. But only under the circumstances that I see in grocery stores, what I see at Starbucks — 6 or more feet apart and don’t move until the person ahead of you does. I believe that the polling stations are going to do that, but I absolutely understand people who have a concern about that, and they should be able to vote by mail.
Q: If you could, for those of us who sometimes wake up with this feeling of doom, how do we turn this around? How do we stop the suffering? Can you tell us what keeps you going and why we should be optimistic?
A: Well, that’s a good way to end the discussion, Geoff, because this will end. I mean, when you’re in something that’s so stressful, you have to worry about despair setting in. Like, “My God, I’m in a hopeless situation.” It’s not. It will end. We will get out of this and we will return to normal. Don’t give up. Don’t despair. Don’t throw caution to the wind. We can end this.