Stopping future pandemics
Wildlife trade ban
Thank you, Sen. John Cornyn, for taking the necessary steps to protect American citizens from future diseases transmitted by wildlife through your new bill, the Preventing Future Pandemics Act, S. 4749.
COVID-19 has wreaked havoc almost unparalleled in the modern age — killing more than a million people globally, including more than 200,000 Americans, and sickening millions more. Live wildlife markets and the associated trade create the perfect environment for zoonotic diseases to mutate, propagate and spread to humans due to the large number of species and animals contained in filthy conditions in close proximity to humans. This bill would place our nation in a strong position to lead the global fight against future zoonotic pandemics, both by setting the standard at home and through a number of strategies to work with the global community to create a safer future for all.
The Preventing Future Pandemics Act is crucial in establishing a new paradigm around our treatment, exploitation and interactions with wild animals to avoid another pandemic like COVID-19.
Stephanie Long, Baytown
The wrong nominee
Regarding “Let the people speak,” (A18, Oct. 16): As I read the various comments by both sides in the conflict and read the record of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, I have concluded that intellectually she is a well- qualified judge which is different than many of Trump’s appointees to the federal judiciary. But I don’t believe she is a nominee that will bring honor to the U. S. Supreme Court, primarily because of the rush to nominate and an even greater rush to confirm. The position is for life and the next justice should be allowed the opportunity to be confirmed in a systematic and open process where the political drama can be put aside.
In today’s time of deep partisan divide, we need and the court needs a process that is beyond reproach and beyond politics. Whether she is confirmed prior to Nov. 3 is such a shortsighted political view and will only serve to damage the Senate, the Supreme Court and Judge Barrett. Everyone needs to step back and take a breath and do what is right for America and for the court.
Bill Turney, Houston
Texans need health care
Regarding “Can’t ignore star power,” (A20, Oct. 7): I am distressed by your endorsement of Dan Crenshaw, which appears to be primarily due to his “national presence.” Ticking off his responses to masking during a pandemic, his criticism of local authorities’ basic health protocols, his lack of a far- sighted energy plan, his disappointing stance on border issues, etc., led me to wonder if the board is just smitten with the Crenshawmystique? He is popular. But is he right on the issues? No. Texans want and desperately need expansion of the American Health Care Act, as well as cleaner energy, two very basic items missing from his agenda. The hope that he will adjust his views or those of Republicans is something we should not waste a vote on.
Susan Boudreaux, Houston