Houston Chronicle

Nearly 5,600-page bill is massive leap of faith for Congress.

- By Mary Clare Jalonick

WASHINGTON — The $900 billion pandemic relief package being rushed through Congress on Monday created a familiar yearend conundrum for lawmakers: It was a bill too big to fail, and also too big to read.

Delivering virus aid to the country required a leap of faith for lawmakers as they were casting their votes, practicall­y sight unseen, for a sprawling, 5,593page bill that linked the pandemic aid with a $1.4 trillion annual spending bill to fund the government. The Senate Historical Office says it’s the longest bill ever passed by Congress.

“I think if we provide everyone a paper copy we would have to destroy an entire forest,” joked House Rules Committee Chairman James McGovern, responding to a Republican request for a hard copy of the legislatio­n. The bill was released at 2 p.m., just hours before the House and Senate were expected to vote on it.

Also in the bill: hundreds of unrelated legislativ­e items negotiated by leadership towin votes from various constituen­cies. It includes extended tax breaks for the alcohol industry and motor speedways, comprehens­ive energy legislatio­n, revised rules for music copyrights, approval of two new Smithsonia­n museums and lessened penalties for the transporta­tion of water hyacinths.

There’s also an entire section on Tibet, including a statement of U.S. policy on how to determine the country’s next spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, and the decriminal­ization of the use of the Swiss coat of arms.

It was a dizzying if familiar finish in the Capitol, where lawmakers often procrastin­ate on passing bills — even those with broad support— until they are on the cusp of heading home for a holiday break. It’s why such bills are often called “Christmas trees,” trimmed with legislativ­e ornaments, and stand among the most glaring symptoms of a broken Congress where the two parties can’t agree until they absolutely have to.

Still, the package was an extraordin­ary response to the global pandemic — the secon dmajor bill this year — and was negotiated almost entirely behind closed doors by congressio­nal leadership. And because it includes long-awaited virus relief for businesses and individual­s, all the additional items were catching a free ride to President Donald Trump’s desk.

Some frustrated members of both parties seemed unlikely to go along even with the bill destined to pass.

“NOT ONE Member of Congress will have had time to read through it before voting later today,” tweeted Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. “This is awful governance, and a disservice to the American people.”

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York echoed that thought: “It’s not good enough to hear about what’s in the bill,” she tweeted just before it was released. “Members of Congress need to see & read the bills we are expected to vote on. I know it’s ‘controvers­ial’ & I get in trouble for sharing things like this, but the people of this country deserve to know. They deserve better.”

Rep. Mark Walker, R-N.C., said: “I can’t in good faith vote for legislatio­n of this magnitude without first thoroughly examining its contents and how it affects North Carolinian­s and their futures.” He called a $600 check for individual­s suffering economical­ly “too little, too late.”

Some of the unrelated items weren’t controvers­ial. There’s relief for victims of steep surprise medical bills and the approval of the two museums that will honor American Latinos and women. A Republican senator blocked the two museums earlier this month even though they have broad bipartisan support.

Other items in the package hadn’t passed on their own due to partisan bickering that stalled much of the Senate’s work. They included clean energy provisions, the result of a bipartisan compromise, and legislatio­n renewing the nation’s intelligen­ce programs. The bill also overhauls the aircraft certificat­ion process in the wake of crashes of Boeing 737 MAX planes — legislatio­n that the House Transporta­tion Committee called “one of the most significan­t overhauls to the FAA certificat­ion reform process in recent history.”

Several high-ticket items won inclusion, including an almost 400-page water resources bill that targets $10 billion for 46 Army Corps of Engineers flood control, environmen­tal and coastal protection projects. There was also $7 billion to increase access to broadband, $4 billion to help other nations vaccinate their people, $14 billion for cash-starved transit systems, Amtrak and airports.

And then there were the smaller items stowed away in the thousands of pages — important to some lawmakers, but unlikely to win coveted floor time in a freestandi­ng bill.

One section repealed a variety of little-known criminal penalties for minor violations, including the transporta­tion of the water hyacinths and the use of the Swiss coat of arms. The section also decriminal­izes the unauthoriz­ed applicatio­n of theft prevention decals or devices, and the unauthoriz­ed use of the 4-H Club emblem, the “Smokey Bear” character or name, the “Woodsy Owl” character, name or slogan, or “The Golden Eagle Insignia.”

Though most of the items were listed in lengthy bill summaries, it was unlikely that most lawmakers would even know those things were there.

“Here are the 5,593 pages of language which I’m now perusing and on which we’ll be voting in about six hours,” tweeted Minnesota Rep. Dean Phillips, a Democrat who worked on the virus relief compromise.

Phillips asked where he could find Evelyn Wood, the late American educator who popularize­d speed reading.

 ?? Stefani Reynolds / New York Times ?? Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell walks to his office Monday. Lawmakers struck a $900 billion stimulus compromise, but many lawmakers complained the mammoth bill contains too much to read with too many partisan provisions.
Stefani Reynolds / New York Times Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell walks to his office Monday. Lawmakers struck a $900 billion stimulus compromise, but many lawmakers complained the mammoth bill contains too much to read with too many partisan provisions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States