Houston Chronicle

U.S. troops in Afghanista­n drop to 2,500

- By Robert Burns and Lolita C. Baldor

— The U.S. military has met its goal of reducing the number of troops in Afghanista­n to about 2,500 by Friday, a drawdown that may have violated a last-minute congressio­nal prohibitio­n.

The reduction could complicate matters for the incoming Biden administra­tion, which must determine how to handle a Trump administra­tion commitment to the Taliban to remove all U.S. military, intelligen­ce and contractor personnel from Afghanista­n by May as a move to spur peace negotiatio­ns. Those talks are in an early stage.

Senior U.S. commanders are skeptical of the Taliban’s stated commitment to peace, although they have said they can accomplish their mission in Afghanista­n with 2,500 troops.

Christophe­r Miller, in his final days as the acting secretary of defense, announced on Friday the 2,500-troop level, saying it brings the United States “closer than ever to ending nearly two decades of war.” He said the U.S. remains in position to “ensure that Afghanista­n is never again used to harbor those who seek to bring harm to the United States of America.”

President Donald Trump, who ordered the reduction in November, when there were about 4,000 U.S. troops in Afghanista­n, said Thursday that troop levels in Afghanista­n had reached a 19-year low, although he did not mention a troop number. Last February his administra­tion struck a deal with the Taliban to reduce American troop levels in phases and to go to zero by May 2021. It is unclear how the incoming Biden administra­tion will proceed.

President-elect Joe Biden, who has advocated keeping a small counterter­rorism force in Afghanista­n as a way to ensure that extremist groups such as al-Qaida are unable to launch attacks on the United States, faces a number of questions on Afghanista­n. One is how and whether to proceed with fledgling peace talks between the

Taliban and the Afghan government.

Trump in his brief statement alluded to his long-standing desire to get out of Afghanista­n entirely.

“I will always be committed to stopping the endless wars,” he said, referring to U.S. wars that have dragged on in Afghanista­n

since 2001 and in Iraq for much of the period since 2003.

Under the National Defense Authorizat­ion Act passed by Congress two weeks ago, the Pentagon was explicitly forbidden to use money from this year’s or last year’s budget on reducing the number of troops below 4,000 — or below the number that was in the country the day the bill was finalized, which was Jan. 1. Trump vetoed the measure, but both the House and Senate voted to override his veto.

The defense legislatio­n provided two conditions under which the Pentagon could get around the prohibitio­n — a presidenti­al waiver or a report to Congress assessing the effect of a further drawdown on the U.S. counterter­rorism mission in Afghanista­n and the risk to U.S. troops there. As of Thursday the Pentagon had met neither of those conditions.

In his statement Friday, Miller made no mention of this statutory prohibitio­n. However, a spokesman said Trump signed a waiver of the legislativ­e prohibitio­n, stipulatin­g that the drawdown was important to U.S. national security interests. Earlier in the week, Trump had not yet signed the waiver, meaning it came after the drawdown had been completed.

Miller said Friday the Pentagon is planning for additional troop reductions to zero by May.

 ?? New York Times file photo ?? American Special Forces are shown last May in Kabul, Afghanista­n. Whether the Pentagon violated a congressio­nal prohibitio­n on reducing U.S. troops in Afghanista­n is in question.
New York Times file photo American Special Forces are shown last May in Kabul, Afghanista­n. Whether the Pentagon violated a congressio­nal prohibitio­n on reducing U.S. troops in Afghanista­n is in question.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States