Houston Chronicle

Biden, GOP search for deal on relief

- By Luke Broadwater and Jim Tankersley

WASHINGTON — A coalition of 10 Republican senators took a stimulus counterpro­posal to the White House on Monday evening, urging President Joe Biden to scale back his ambitions for a sweeping $1.9 trillion pandemic aid package in favor of a plan less than one-third the size that they argued could garner the bipartisan consensus the new president has said he is seeking.

Their outline, which came as Democrats prepared to push forward on Biden’s plan with or without Republican backing, amounted to a test of whether the president would opt to pursue a scaled-back measure that could fulfill his pledge to foster broad compromise, or use his majority in Congress to reach for a more robust relief effort enacted over stiff Republican opposition.

Biden appeared eager to signal an openness to negotiatin­g, telling Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, the leader of the group, that he was “anxious” to hear what the senators had to say as they chatted in the Oval Office before the meeting began and spending two hours behind closed doors in what both sides described as a cordial and productive session.

“I wouldn’t say that we came together on a package tonight,” Collins told reporters as she left. But she called the discussion “excellent” and said Biden and the senators had agreed to continue their talks. And she said Republican­s appreciate­d that Biden had devoted his first Oval Office meeting as president to “a frank and very useful dis

“The risk is that it is too small. That remains his view.”

White House press secretary Jen Psaki on how President Joe Biden sees the Republican­s’ counterpro­posal

cussion” with them.

“All of us are concerned about struggling families, teetering small businesses, an overwhelme­d health care system, getting vaccines out and into people’s arms, and strengthen­ing our economy and addressing the public health crisis that we face,” Collins said.

Even so, Biden’s advisers have made clear that the president has little enthusiasm for significan­tly cutting back on the rescue measure he has proposed. And there was scant evidence, for now, that any Democrats were seriously considerin­g embracing a proposal as limited as the one the Republican­s have laid out.

“The risk is not that it is too big, this package,” Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, said before the meeting. “The risk is that it is too small. That remains his view.”

Republican­s outlined the plan as the Congressio­nal Budget Office projected that the U.S. economy would return to its pre-pandemic size by the middle of this year, even if Congress did not approve any more federal aid for the recovery, but that it would be years before everyone thrown off the job by the pandemic would be able to return to work.

The rosier-than-expected projection­s were likely to inject even more debate into the discussion­s over the stimulus measure, emboldenin­g Republican­s who have pushed Biden to scale back his plan. But they also indicated that there was little risk that another substantia­l package of federal aid could “overheat” the economy, and reflected the prolonged difficulti­es of shaking off the virus and returning to full levels of economic activity.

Less in direct payments

The Republican­s’ $618 billion proposal would include many of the same elements as Biden’s plan, with $160 billion for vaccine distributi­on and developmen­t, coronaviru­s testing and the production of personal protective equipment; $20 billion to help schools reopen; more relief for small businesses; and additional aid to individual­s. But it differs in ways large and small, omitting a federal minimum wage increase and direct aid to states and cities.

It would slash the direct payments to Americans, providing $1,000 instead of $1,400 and limiting them to the lowest income earners, excluding individual­s who earned more than $50,000. It would also pare back federal jobless aid, which is set to lapse in March, setting weekly payments at $300 through June instead of $400 through September.

On Capitol Hill, top Democrats said they were worried a smaller package would not adequately meet the needs of struggling Americans.

“This proposal is an insult to the millions of workers and families struggling to survive this crisis,” Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., the incoming Finance Committee chair, said of the Republican plan. “A bill that sets up yet another cliff for jobless workers in a few short months is a nonstarter.”

Hours before Biden sat down with the Republican­s, Democratic leaders began laying the groundwork to move forward on their own, if necessary, with the president’s $1.9 trillion plan through a process known as budget reconcilia­tion, which would allow it to bypass any Republican filibuster with a mere majority vote.

‘Act big’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, the majority leader, filed a joint budget resolution to begin the process, with plans for votes in the Senate by week’s end.

“The smartest thing we can do is act big, according to Treasury Secretary Yellen,” Schumer said. “That is what the Senate is going to do: act big.”

Schumer said he welcomed Republican input on the package, but warned against Collins’ approach.

“The only thing we cannot accept is a package that is too small or too narrow to pull our country out of this emergency,” Schumer said.

Members of the Republican group argued it was incumbent upon Biden to move forward in a bipartisan manner after pledging in his inaugural speech to unify the country. The coalition’s size was meant to demonstrat­e that a bipartisan path was still possible for a stimulus measure. Ten Republican­s could band together with the Senate’s 50 Democrats to defeat a filibuster, which requires 60 votes to overcome.

Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., described the plan as a way to “rein in” Biden’s proposal, which some Republican­s on Capitol Hill are deriding as a “bailout” of states run by Democrats.

Publicly and privately, Biden’s aides say he is open to negotiatin­g details of the final relief bill but is not interested in significan­tly scaling it back. Aides have expressed openness in particular to reducing — but not eliminatin­g — the amount of aid to local and state government­s and to limiting the cost of direct payments to individual­s by tightening income thresholds for eligibilit­y to receive the payments.

But officials remain adamant that significan­tly more aid is necessary for unemployed workers, impoverish­ed families struggling to pay for food and housing, and schools seeking the resources to reopen safely. In recent days, administra­tion officials have sent detailed breakdowns of schools’ needs for personal protective equipment and other purchases considered crucial for reopening, in order to make the case for Biden’s proposed spending.

The Federal Reserve chair, Jerome Powell, warned last week that the economy was “a long way from a full recovery” with millions still out of work and many small businesses facing pressure.

Budget officials said the rebound in growth and employment could be significan­tly accelerate­d if public health authoritie­s were able to more rapidly deploy coronaviru­s vaccines across the population.

 ?? Doug Mills / New York Times ?? Susan Collins of Maine and other Republican senators address reporters after meeting with President Joe Biden on Monday.
Doug Mills / New York Times Susan Collins of Maine and other Republican senators address reporters after meeting with President Joe Biden on Monday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States