Landmark elections bill is debated in the Senate
The Senate took its first steps Wednesday to advance one of Democrats’ top legislative priorities, convening an opening hearing on a sweeping elections bill that would expand voting rights and blunt some Republican state legislators’ efforts to restrict access to the ballot box.
Chock-full of liberal priorities, the For the People Act would usher in landmark changes making it easier to vote, enact new campaign finance laws and end partisan gerrymandering of congressional districts.
The legislation passed the House along party lines earlier this month. It faces solid opposition from Republicans, who are working to clamp down on ballot access and who argue that the bill is a power grab by Democrats.
Democrats on the Senate Rules Committee hope that testimony from former Attorney General Eric Holder, prominent voting experts and anti-corruption advocates will help build on a rising drumbeat of support from liberals.
“Today, in the 21st century, there is a concerted, nationwide effort to limit the rights of citizens to vote and to truly have a voice in their own government,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
He called voting rollbacks in several states an “existential threat to our democracy” reminiscent of Jim Crow segregationist laws, chanting “Shame! Shame! Shame!” at the Republicans promoting them.
Republicans are equally adamant in their opposition to a measure that promises to be a heavy lift for Democrats.
They call it an attempt by Democrats to give themselves a permanent political advantage by driving up turnout among minority groups and by preventing Republicans, who control a majority of statehouses, from drawing new congressional districts this year that would tilt the playing field in their favor.
“This bill is the single most dangerous bill this committee has ever considered,” Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz said. “This bill is designed to corrupt the election process permanently, and it is a brazen and shameless power grab by Democrats.”
He falsely claimed that the bill would register millions of unauthorized immigrants to vote and accused Democrats of wanting the most violent criminals to cast ballots. Non-citizens can’t vote legally, and the bill would do nothing to change that or a requirement that people registering to vote swear they’re citizens.
It would extend the franchise to millions of former felons, as some states already do, but only after they have served their terms.
So far, not a single Republican supports the nearly 800-page bill, and Democrats are unlikely to win support even from all 50 of their senators without substantial changes.
Democrats’ best hope for enacting the legislation increasingly appears to be to try to leverage its voting protections — which many liberals view as a life-ordeath matter not just for American democracy, but for their own political futures — to justify triggering the Senate’s so-called nuclear option.
That would eliminate the filibuster rule requiring 60 votes, rather than a simple majority, to advance most bills. For now, though, even that remains out of reach as long as conservative Democrats in the 50-50 Senate are opposed.
To make the case against the bill, Republicans turned to two officials who backed an effort to overturn President Joe Biden’s election victory.
Mac Warner, West Virginia’s secretary of state, and Todd Rokita, Indiana’s attorney general, supported a Texas lawsuit late last year asking the Supreme Court to invalidate the election results in key battleground states Biden won, citing groundless claims of voting fraud and other irregularities being spread by former President Donald Trump.
Two former Republican chairmen of the Federal Election Commission also testified in opposition Wednesday. Republicans were particularly outspoken against changes that would transform the body, which regulates federal elections, from a bipartisan and largely toothless entity into a more partisan and punitive one.
The bill proposes restructuring the FEC from an evenly split bipartisan panel into one with an odd number of members, where a chairman selected by the president would effectively take control.
“Talk about ‘shame,’” said Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the Senate minority leader.