Big companies line up to crush green transparency resolutions
With the annual proxy season about to kick off, corporate executives are encountering increasing investor scrutiny about their environmental policies. But rather than support green initiatives or even compromise with shareholders, some of the world’s biggest companies instead plan to crush efforts to slow the climate catastrophe.
Investors will be voting on at least 20 separate resolutions that are calling for more transparent climate disclosures at companies ranging from oil giant Chevron Corp. to rail freight operator Union Pacific Corp. to cable-television operator Charter Communications Inc.
“Almost universally, the quality of corporate reporting needs to improve to show how climate change is impacting a company’s bottom line, not only now but in the future,” said Jonathan Bailey, head of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) investing at Neuberger Berman Group, adding that his firm has held discussions about environmental risks with fossil fuel behemoths, including Chevron and Exxon Mobil Corp.
The increase in investor activism is emerging at the same time President Joe Biden’s administration is considering a pledge to cut U.S. greenhousegas emissions by 50 percent or more by the end of the decade, almost doubling the previous commitment. At the Securities and Exchange Commission, the first-ever senior policy adviser for climate and ESG was just appointed, putting both issues atop the agency’s priorities, according to analysts at UBS Group.
But back in the C-suite, the lateness of the hour when it comes to accelerating global warming and its consequences for humanity may have yet to resonate.
Last week, Chevron said in its proxy statement that it will face three climate-related votes, including a call to reduce its Scope 3, or customer emissions, and one about disclosing more information about its lobbying efforts.
The oil company told investors to vote “no” on all of them.
The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, which started the “Say on Climate” campaign last year, has been influential in helping push for many of these resolutions, said Rob Du Boff, an ESG analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence.
CIFF wants companies to establish concrete five- to 10year business strategies to reduce their greenhouse-gas emissions. The transition plans must be transparent, with annual reporting on performance. Executive remuneration needs to be tied to the success of those initiatives, said Michael Hugman, CIFF’s director of climate finance.
“For real change to happen, we need to see active engagement from both the biggest asset managers and retail investors to press companies to raise their climate ambitions,” Hugman said.
Shareholders are so far missing their chance “to encourage companies to improve,” Hugman said. The largest asset managers need to get more vocal about everything from the election of directors to calls for companies to disclose and reduce their emissions, he said.
CIFF was founded by billionaire hedge fund manager Chris Hohn, who has filed climaterelated shareholder resolutions with companies including Union Pacific and Charter Communications.
The SEC rejected Union Pacific’s attempt to exclude Hohn’s resolution. His proposal calls for the company to disclose its greenhouse-gas emissions and then provide shareholders with the chance, at each annual meeting, to express their nonbinding approval or disapproval of the company's emissionsreduction plan.
Charter Communications also wants shareholders to vote against Hohn’s resolution, which is similar to what’s filed with Union Pacific. In an SEC filing, Charter said (among other things) that the board “doesn’t believe” that holding an annual stockholder vote on the company’s greenhouse-gas emissions is “an effective use of time and resources.”