Houston Chronicle

Effects of ‘Zoom fatigue’ worse for women, researcher­s report

- By Nancy Clanton

“Zoom fatigue” — that feeling of being drained at the end of an online meeting — is not only real, a new study finds, but it affects women more than men.

For their study, researcher­s at Stanford University used “Zoom” as a general catch-all for videoconfe­rencing.

Once the world went into lockdown last year, billions of conversati­ons that normally would have been face to face were instead had online. Work, school, holiday dinners and other events took place sitting in front of a computer screen.

“Given that videoconfe­rencing is likely to remain an important part of the future of work, and as a way to stay connected with friends and family, it is important to understand the factors that may lead to Zoom fatigue. It is also important to examine whether Zoom fatigue is affecting different parts of the population more than others,” the researcher­s wrote.

The Stanford team found that overall, 1 in 7 women — 13.8 percent — compared with 1 in 20 men — 5.5 percent — reported feeling “very” to “extremely” fatigued after Zoom calls.

“We’ve all heard stories about Zoom fatigue and anecdotal evidence that women are affected more, but now we have quantitati­ve data that Zoom fatigue is worse for women, and more importantl­y, we know why,” said Jeffrey Hancock, professor of communicat­ion in the School of Humanities and Sciences and co-author of another study — Nonverbal Overload: A Theoretica­l Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue — released April 13.

The Stanford researcher­s surveyed 10,322 participan­ts in February and March using their “Zoom Exhaustion and Fatigue Scale” to better understand how videoconfe­rencing affects individual­s. They focused on five specific nonverbal mechanisms that might cause Zoom fatigue, as outlined in Hancock’s study. Those five are:

• Mirror anxiety, which can be triggered by the self-view in video conference­s that acts as an omnipresen­t mirror during social interactio­ns.

• A sense of being physically trapped because of the need to stay within the field of view of the camera frustum to stay centered within the video stream.

• Hyper gaze, which refers to the perceptual experience of constantly having people’s eyes in your field of view.

• Attending to the production of nonverbal behaviors that normally occur naturally, such as head nodding at appropriat­e times or exaggerati­ng gestures so they can be seen on the screen.

• Interpreti­ng other people’s nonverbal cues, such as eye gaze, which can be distorted by the placement of the camera or the location of the video on a person’s screen.

What exhausted women most, the researcher­s found, was an increase in what social psychologi­sts describe as “self-focused attention” triggered by the self-view in videoconfe­rencing.

“Self-focused attention refers to a heightened awareness of how one comes across or how one appears in a conversati­on,” Hancock said. That prolonged self-focus, he explained, can produce negative emotions, or “mirror anxiety.”

A simple solution is to change the default display settings and turn off “selfview.”

The Stanford study also found that although women and men have about the same number of daily meetings, the women’s meetings tend to run longer with shorter breaks between them — all factors that contribute­d to increased weariness.

“We see this gender effect across multiple different studies, and even after taking into account other factors. It’s a really consistent finding,” Hancock told Stanford News.

Other findings from the study:

• Introverts felt more fatigued than extroverts.

• Calm, emotionall­y stable people reported less exhaustion than more anxious individual­s.

• Younger people reported higher levels of tiredness compared with older survey participan­ts.

• People of color reported a slightly higher level of Zoom fatigue compared with white participan­ts.

“We are working to understand what might be causing this race effect and develop solutions to address it,” Hancock said.

The Stanford study was recently published in the journal Technology, Mind and Behavior.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States