Houston Chronicle

Texas education fixes are common sense

- By David DeMatthews and David S. Knight DeMatthews is an associate professor at the University of Texas at Austin. Knight is an assistant professor at the University of Washington.

The Texas Legislatur­e is considerin­g numerous education bills, but few policymake­rs have aligned their proposals to address longstandi­ng statewide problems that may have grown during the pandemic. A few commonsens­e policies could go a long way for Texas students.

One longstandi­ng problem is the state’s struggles to monitor its schools and create a high-quality accountabi­lity system. Just in the past five years, for example, the state had several incidents including a charter school system leasing a corporate jet, an investigat­ion into statewide special education practices stemming from the delay and denial of needed supports to thousands of students with disabiliti­es, and an outdated $90 million annual testing system that has crashed twice in recent years.

The Texas Education Agency commission­er is designated as the educationa­l leader in the state and has broad authority to improve public education, yet the governor-appointed position has one requiremen­t: U.S. citizenshi­p. The state requires significan­t education and training for a kindergart­en teacher who oversees about 20 students but almost no requiremen­ts for an individual responsibl­e for millions of students. A commonsens­e improvemen­t would be to increase required qualificat­ions for the commission­er role, especially as some proposed legislatio­n calls on the commission­er to identify evidence-based teaching practices and programs to accelerate learning as schools reopen.

Another problem confrontin­g Texas is the rapid proliferat­ion of charter schools without sufficient concern for the financial impact on nearby school districts or for the efficient allocation of education tax dollars systemwide. Increased transparen­cy related to charter authorizat­ion and financial reporting makes sense. Though they did not get a hearing, Texas House Bill 1746 and House Bill 1748 would have been a good start because they limit the commission­er’s power to waive preexistin­g charter expansion requiremen­ts and mandate the disclosure of any taxpayer funds and jobs leaving Texas for out-of-state charter groups.

The school finance system has also been a longstandi­ng issue in the state partly because it allocates approximat­ely the same level of total funding to the highest and lowest-poverty districts. This practice goes against research showing that the higher-poverty districts require greater funding to provide equal educationa­l opportunit­y. The mechanism for funding charter schools is equally troubled.

During the previous session, charter schools received additional funding, but charter advocates maintain that sector receives an unfair share of state funds. A recent study we conducted points out several problems that could easily be addressed through reforms. Larger charter districts were relatively overfunded, while smaller charters received less funding than otherwise similar traditiona­l public schools. A more commonsens­e policy would be to ensure the charter school finance system adjusts for district size and facilities costs.

Many Texans agree the costly testing system is in need of reform. House Bill 764 is a promising way to improve the system because it eliminates all standardiz­ed tests not required by federal law in elementary and middle school and end-of-course exams for high school students. Also, if any changes are made to federal laws that reduce the number or frequency of tests required, the state must adopt rules to make those same reductions.

Although HB 764 would likely improve the state's testing system, Senate Bill 2094 could make matters worse. According to Raise Your Hand Texas, the bill would fund students based on their performanc­e on the STAAR exam, which may increase the emphasis on testing, further the inequitabl­e funding distributi­on and create a punitive school finance system based on test results.

Although some progress has been made in prior years, the state’s ability to create an inclusive curriculum has been a longstandi­ng battle. This year, Senate Bill 174 emphasizes educator training to promote student free speech and examine social injustice and civil rights issues. However, that bill got little traction, and instead two proposed bills that discourage classroom discussion­s about racism, sexism and other injustices are. Texas students need access to a curriculum that helps them make sense of current events and inspires them to meaningful­ly participat­e in our democracy.

After a year of disruption, now is the time to address these critical issues with commonsens­e policies so Texas students can reach their fullest potential. Most Texans would probably agree to less testing and a greater emphasis on civic engagement and responsibi­lity. Now our policymake­rs need to focus their attention on turning commonsens­e reforms into reality.

 ?? Elizabeth Conley / Staff file photo ?? The school finance system is a major issue in Texas. It allocates about the same level of total funding to the highest- and lowest-poverty districts.
Elizabeth Conley / Staff file photo The school finance system is a major issue in Texas. It allocates about the same level of total funding to the highest- and lowest-poverty districts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States