Houston Chronicle

An inept ERCOT contribute­d to February freeze fiasco

- CHRIS TOMLINSON Commentary

Texans are learning the ageold lesson you get what you pay for.

As journalist­s dig into the data — because the government­s have not done it so far — we are learning how an underfunde­d, toothless electric grid manager likely made the February freeze more deadly and cost Texas consumers billions of dollars in unnecessar­y bills.

My friends Russell Gold and Katherine Blunt at the Wall Street Journal went through the nonprofit Electric Reliabilit­y Council of Texas’ logs. They discovered operators implemente­d a half-baked protocol and cut power to major industrial users to stabilize the grid. Called a demand response program, ERCOT pays the industrial users for the privilege of blacking them out when supply is tight.

I call the program half-baked because ERCOT did not know which industries they were blacking out. Oil and natural gas producers are among the biggest electricit­y users in Texas, and guess what we really, really need to keep our houses warm during a deep freeze?

Natural gas.

Texas is the nation’s proud leader in renewable energy, and we have our share of coal-fired power plants. But when electricit­y demand peaks, natural gas comes to the rescue. So, what on earth led ERCOT to think paying natural gas producers to go offline in an emergency was a

good idea?

“We do not know what type of facility it is,” Kenan Ögelman, ERCOT’s vice president of commercial operations, told the Journal.

ERCOT did not intentiona­lly pay natural gas companies to stop sending fuel to the state’s power plants during a blackout. The grid’s managers just didn’t know what they were doing.

During the blackout, former ERCOT CEO Bill Magness tried to explain to an angry public how his quasi-government­al organizati­on is just an air traffic controller for electricit­y. The Texas Legislatur­e does not authorize it to enforce reliabilit­y standards or tell companies what to do.

Low regulation was the calling card of former Gov. Rick Perry, who oversaw the transition from a traditiona­l electric utility system to the competitiv­e wholesale market we have today. Texas’ conservati­ve philosophy expects competitio­n to sort everything out.

ERCOT’s primary job is to manage an algorithm that raises and lowers electricit­y prices based on supply and demand. Customers only pay when they need and get power from private companies. When we need electricit­y the most, the price skyrockets, and for most generators, those handfuls of hours every year are when they make their profits.

The Legislatur­e felt sure that the opportunit­y to make $9,000 a megawattho­ur during a crisis would incentiviz­e generators to spend tens of millions on weatheriza­tion. Some call it the free market at work. Others call it price-gouging. Either way, it didn’t work.

Generators were unprepared for the freeze and went offline, yet ERCOT kept banging its collective head against that wall. Even while it was paying $2 billion for companies, including natural gas producers, to remain blacked out, ERCOT kept the price at $9,000 a megawatt-hour even though generators couldn’t get not enough gas to restart.

Not all Texans were blacked out, though, and electricit­y retailers, co-ops and municipal utilities ran up huge bills. ERCOT’s managers, with one of Gov. Greg Abbott’s aides in the room, still overrode the algorithm to keep the prices high.

The independen­t market monitor, whose job is to make sure ERCOT and generators play fair, figures ERCOT’s decision to keep prices artificial­ly escalated cost Texas consumers $16 billion in overcharge­s. When the Texas Senate tried to claw that back, House Speaker Dade Phelan stopped it.

Of course, cutting power to natural gas producers also created a natural gas shortage, sending the price from $3 for a million British thermal units to $400. Natural gas companies and pipeline operators that stayed online made more than $4 billion in extra profits.

Municipal and co-op gas and electric utilities are in dire financial trouble. Some, like San Antonio’s CPS, are suing to avoid paying the overcharge­s.

To sum up, millions of Texans spent days without power on the coldest nights in a generation and will likely end up overpaying more than $20 billion for the privilege by the time all is said and done. We are paying for our leaders’ decision to withhold regulatory authority from state agencies and underfund their ability to ensure a coordinate­d energy supply chain.

A few weeks after the Texas Blackout, I wrote that we needed time to investigat­e why ERCOT ordered blackouts that lasted days and left nearly 200 people dead, according to a Houston Chronicle accounting.

The picture is becoming more apparent, though there are probably more disturbing revelation­s to come. But as the Legislatur­e moves into its final days, our elected officials are doing nothing to fix the underlying problems. This can happen again.

 ?? Steve Gonzales / Staff photograph­er ?? An underfunde­d electric grid manager likely made the February freeze more deadly.
Steve Gonzales / Staff photograph­er An underfunde­d electric grid manager likely made the February freeze more deadly.
 ??  ??
 ?? Karen Warren / Staff photograph­er ?? Heights resident Bill Weinle boils water on his stove to add heat in his home, which was without power and water on Feb. 17. A winter storm left people without power and water along with freezing temperatur­es.
Karen Warren / Staff photograph­er Heights resident Bill Weinle boils water on his stove to add heat in his home, which was without power and water on Feb. 17. A winter storm left people without power and water along with freezing temperatur­es.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States