Houston Chronicle

Beef now under pressure as demand for climate-friendly meals increases

- By Mike Dorning

Eleven Madison Park, a top Manhattan restaurant, is going meatless. The Epicurious cooking site stopped posting new beef recipes. The Culinary Institute of America is promoting “plant-forward” menus. Dozens of colleges, including Harvard and Stanford, are shifting toward “climate-friendly” meals.

If this continues — and the Boston Consulting Group and Kearney believe the trend is global and growing — beef could be the new coal, shunned by elite tastemaker­s over rising temperatur­es and squeezed by increasing­ly cheap alternativ­es.

“Beef is under a whole lot of pressure,” said Anthony Leiserowit­z, director of Yale University’s Program on Climate Change Communicat­ions. “It was the shift in market forces that was the death knell for coal. And it’s the same thing here. It’s going to be the shift in consumer tastes and preference­s, not some regulation.”

Americans do claim to want a shift. Seventy percent say it would be healthier if the country ate less meat and 58 percent would like to eat more fruits, vegetables, nuts and whole grains, according to a 2020 survey by the food market research firm Datassenti­al. Worries about climate pile on top of long-standing health concerns about red meat.

Yet, while long-term trends back the change, U.S. consumptio­n of beef actually ticked up slightly during the 2020 pandemic, to 55.8 pounds per person. It has been slowly rising since 2015 after plunging during the 2007-2009 Great Recession. Consumptio­n last year remained 11.4 percent below 2006 and nearly 40 percent below peak 1970s levels, according to the U.S. Agricultur­e Department.

Tastemaker­s are pushing. Popular culinary personalit­ies including chef Jamie Oliver are promoting plant-centric meals. Bill Gates is urging developed nations to completely give up convention­al beef. Many school and corporate cafeterias have dropped all-beef patties for “blended burgers” made of one-third mushrooms.

Meanwhile, a backlash is stirring among rural Republican politician­s who scent a new battlegrou­nd in the partisan culture wars. In broad swaths of the Heartland, cattle and the rows of corn grown for animal feed are central to livelihood and identity. More than a third of U.S. farms and ranches are beef cattle operations, making it the single largest segment of U.S. agricultur­e. Burgers sizzle from countless backyard barbecues.

Nebraska Governor Pete Ricketts seized on a suggestion by his Democratic counterpar­t in neighborin­g Colorado that the state’s residents cut red meat for one day to counter with a “Meat on the Menu” Day. Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds outdid him, declaring all of April “Meat on the Menu Month.” Fox News later spent days promoting phony accusation­s the Biden administra­tion had launched a “War on Beef.”

It hasn’t, but there is no escaping the fact that beef is a climate villain. Cows’ ruminant digestive system ferments grass and other feed in multiple stomach compartmen­ts, burping methane, a greenhouse gas 25 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. Cattle’s relatively long lifespan compared to other meat sources adds to their climate impact.

Globally, 14.5 percent of human-driven greenhouse gas emissions come from livestock production, with cattle responsibl­e for twothirds, according to the United Nations Food and Agricultur­e Organizati­on. Per gram of protein, beef production has more than 6 times the climate impact of pork, more than 8 times that of poultry and 113 times that of peas, according to a 2018 analysis of global production in the journal Science. U.S. livestock producers generally have lower emissions than worldwide averages because of production efficienci­es.

Cattle producers have sought to blunt the appeal of competing faux meat products with state laws banning them from using common meat terms and addressed environmen­tal criticism by promoting the role of ranchers as stewards of the land.

“That Wild West is alive and well because cattle producers protect that space and make it resilient,” said Kaitlynn Glover, executive director of natural resources for the National Cattlemen’s Beef Associatio­n.

For now, an emerging global middle class in China and elsewhere is bolstering global demand for meat and feed-grains used for livestock, improving export opportunit­ies for American farmers and ranchers. Agricultur­e Secretary Tom Vilsack has said Biden administra­tion climate initiative­s won’t target meat consumptio­n.

Investors are rushing into plant-based and cultivated faux meat startups. A Boston Consulting Group report in March heralded the beginning of a “protein transforma­tion” and forecast meat alternativ­es would make up 11-22 percent of the global protein market by 2035. A Kearney study projects global meat sales will begin to drop by 2025 and decline 33 percent by 2040 as alternativ­es take away market share.

 ??  ?? Jonathan Tilove / Austin American-Statesman / Tribune News Service Cattle stand in a feedlot next to the JBS beef plant in Cactus. More restaurant­s are going meatless.
Jonathan Tilove / Austin American-Statesman / Tribune News Service Cattle stand in a feedlot next to the JBS beef plant in Cactus. More restaurant­s are going meatless.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States