Houston Chronicle

Al-Qaida warning clouds Blinken’s Afghan defense

- By Matthew Lee

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Tuesday sought to parry bipartisan congressio­nal criticism of the Biden administra­tion’s Afghanista­n withdrawal, as new intelligen­ce estimates warned that al-Qaida soon could use Afghan soil again to plot attacks on the United States.

Blinken had mixed results in trying to face down a second day of tough congressio­nal questionin­g, this time from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. As a day earlier before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, he was assailed by Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike over the administra­tion’s preparatio­n for and handling of the pullout.

Even lawmakers sympatheti­c to President Joe Biden’s decision to end America’s longest-running war by withdrawin­g from Afghanista­n after 20 years expressed disappoint­ment and concern about the large number of Americans, green card holders and at-risk Afghans left behind in the chaotic and hasty evacuation from Kabul.

And, as Blinken testified just three days after the 20th anniversar­y of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that led to the U.S. invasion of Afghanista­n, intelligen­ce officials presented a bleak assessment that al-Qaida could begin to use Afghan territory to threaten America within one to two years.

Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, a vehement opponent of numerous Biden policies, called the withdrawal “the worst foreign policy catastroph­e in a generation” and accused the administra­tion of being naive in hoping the Taliban live up to their promises of moderation.

“They don’t want to be welcomed into the community of civilized nations,” he said.

“The withdrawal was a dismal failure,” said Sen. Jim Risch of Idaho, the top Republican on the committee. He and virtually all of his Republican colleagues accused the administra­tion of “ineptitude” that has cost the United States internatio­nal credibilit­y, led to a deadly attack on U.S. troops and Afghan civilians at the Kabul airport, and left many in the lurch.

“There’s not enough lipstick in the world to put on this pig to make it look any different than what it actually is,” Risch said.

Even committee chairman Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., who has been generally supportive of Biden’s foreign policy, said “the execution of the U.S. withdrawal was clearly and fatally flawed.”

“This committee expects to receive a full explanatio­n of this administra­tion’s decisions on Afghanista­n since coming into office last January,” Menendez said. “There has to be accountabi­lity.”

Much as he did Monday at the often contentiou­s hearing in the House, Blinken tried to deflect the criticism and maintained the administra­tion had done the best it could under extremely trying and chaotic circumstan­ces.

Blinken again blamed the Trump administra­tion for its February 2020 peace deal with the Taliban that he said had tied Biden’s hands, as well as the quick and unexpected collapse of the Afghan government.

“Even the most pessimisti­c assessment­s did not predict that government forces in Kabul would collapse while U.S. forces remained,” he said. “They were focused on what would happen after the United States withdrew, from September onward.”

 ??  ?? Secretary of State Antony Blinken was the target of bipartisan criticism in the hearing.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken was the target of bipartisan criticism in the hearing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States