Houston Chronicle

Richards: ‘We are in a post-Roe world now’

Abortion-rights activist points to Texas’ new law as evidence that Supreme Court is no longer willing to step in and override states

- By Meg Kinnard

A year after the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, one of the country’s top abortion-rights activists warned that the high court’s recent inaction on Texas’ extremely restrictiv­e new abortion law could signal the end of judicial checks and balances on the issue.

“For a lot of people, they’ve always assumed that, even if they lived in a state that passed restrictio­ns on reproducti­ve care, that there was always a judicial system that would be there to protect them and declare these laws unconstitu­tional,” Cecile Richards, former president of Planned Parenthood, told the Associated Press in an interview this week.

“That isn’t happening any more.”

To coincide with Saturday’s anniversar­y of the death of Ginsburg, whom she called “a trailblaze­r and advocate for women everywhere,” Richards released an open letter warning that Texas’ Republican leaders “have outlined a roadmap for other Republican governors to follow suit, with the acquiescen­ce of the Supreme Court.”

“The right to a safe and legal abortion that had been protected under our constituti­on and by our judicial system for nearly 50 years is in jeopardy, and we must fight to fully regain it,” wrote Richards, who stepped down from the helm of Planned Parenthood in 2018 and currently co-chairs American Bridge 21st Century, which supports liberal causes and conducts opposition research on Republican­s.

Texas’ new law, which is the nation’s most restrictiv­e, prohibits abortions once medical profession­als can detect cardiac activity, which is usually around the sixth week of pregnancy and before some women know they’re pregnant. Courts have blocked other states from imposing similar restrictio­ns, but Texas’ law differs significan­tly because it leaves enforcemen­t to private citizens through lawsuits instead of prosecutor­s through criminal charges.

The measure took effect this month after the U.S. Supreme Court declined an emergency appeal from abortion providers asking that it be stayed. Opponents of the law have called it the nation’s biggest curb to abortion rights since the court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which establishe­d a nationwide right to abortion at any point before a fetus can survive outside the womb, which is roughly around the 24th week.

Gov. Greg Abbott has defended the measure — which has no exceptions for rape or incest — saying it does not force victims to give birth and vowing that the state “will work tirelessly to make sure

that we eliminate all rapists from the streets of Texas by aggressive­ly going out and arresting them and prosecutin­g them.”

Abortion providers have said they will comply, but some of Texas’ roughly two dozen abortion clinics have temporaril­y stopped offering abortion services altogether. Clinics in nearby states say they are struggling to meet surging demand, and care for their own residents is being delayed.

The Justice Department is suing Texas, saying in a federal suit that the law was enacted “in open defiance of the Constituti­on” and violates the Supremacy Clause, which says federal law supersedes state law. A federal judge next month is set to consider the case, which argues that the measure unlawfully infringes on the constituti­onal rights of women.

According to a poll earlier this year by the Associated PressNORC Center for Public Affairs Research, a solid majority of Americans believe most abortions should be legal in the first three months of a woman’s pregnancy, but most say the procedure should usually be illegal in the second and third trimesters.

The poll came just weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving a currently blocked Mississipp­i law that would ban abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, two weeks into the second trimester. Similar measures in states across the country are on hold pending the outcome of that case.

Richards, the daughter of the late Texas Gov. Ann Richards, said she is concerned that, without a shift in direction, Roe v. Wade could be headed for extinction in more places. But she pointed to the 2022 midterm elections as what she sees as a way for voters to change that.

“We are in a post-Roe world now,” Richards said. “Here in the state of Texas, Roe is no longer in effect … and all it takes is a Republican governor and a Republican Legislatur­e. Your state could be exactly the same.”

 ?? John Carl D'Annibale / Albany Times Union file photo ?? In an open letter, Cecile Richards warns that Texas’ Republican leaders “have outlined a road map for other Republican governors to follow suit, with the acquiescen­ce of the Supreme Court.”
John Carl D'Annibale / Albany Times Union file photo In an open letter, Cecile Richards warns that Texas’ Republican leaders “have outlined a road map for other Republican governors to follow suit, with the acquiescen­ce of the Supreme Court.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States