Houston Chronicle

Study finds benefits of deep conversati­on

- By Amit Kumar, Michael Kardas and Nicholas Epley Kumar is an assistant professor of marketing at the University of Texas at Austin. Kardas is a postdoctor­al fellow in management and marketing at Northweste­rn University. Epley is the John Templeton Keller

Even as the COVID-19 pandemic persists, there’s hope that life will return to some level of normalcy in 2022.

This includes more opportunit­ies to meet new people and build friendship­s, a process that’s critical for mental and physical well-being.

This does not, however, mean that everyone will take advantage of these new chances to connect.

Even before fears of a virus compelled most people to stay physically distant, our research suggests that people were already keeping too much social distance from one another.

In particular, our forthcomin­g behavioral science research suggests that people tend to be overly pessimisti­c about how conversati­ons with new acquaintan­ces will play out.

Across a dozen experiment­s, participan­ts consistent­ly underestim­ated how much they would enjoy talking with strangers. This was especially true when we asked them to have the kinds of substantiv­e conversati­ons that actually foster friendship­s.

Because of these mistaken beliefs, it seems as though people reach out and connect with others less often and in less meaningful ways than they probably should.

People usually only disclose their deepest disappoint­ments, proudest accomplish­ments and simmering anxieties to close friends and family.

But our experiment­s tested the seemingly radical idea that deep conversati­ons between strangers can end up being surprising­ly satisfying.

In several experiment­s, the participan­ts first reported how they expected to feel after discussing relatively weighty questions like, “what are you most grateful for in your life?” and “when is the last time you cried in front of another person?”

These participan­ts believed they would feel somewhat awkward and only moderately happy discussing these topics with a stranger. But after we prompted them to actually do so, they reported that their conversati­ons were less awkward than they had anticipate­d. Furthermor­e, they felt happier and more connected to the other person than they had assumed.

In other experiment­s, we asked people to write down questions they would normally discuss when first getting to know someone — “weird weather we’re having these days, isn’t it?” — and then to write down deeper and more intimate questions than they would normally discuss, like asking whether the other person was happy with their life.

Again, we found that the participan­ts were especially likely to overestima­te how awkward the ensuing conversati­ons about the more meaningful topics would be, while underestim­ating how happy those conversati­ons would make them.

These mistaken beliefs matter because they can create a barrier to human connection. If you mistakenly think a substantiv­e conversati­on will feel uncomforta­ble, you’re going to probably avoid it. And then you might never realize that your expectatio­ns are off the mark.

Misconcept­ions over the outcomes of deeper conversati­ons may happen, in part, because we also underestim­ate how interested other people are in what we have to share. This makes us more reluctant to open up.

It turns out that, more often than not, strangers do want to hear you talk about more than the weather; they really do care about your fears, feelings, opinions and experience­s.

The results were strikingly consistent. For the experiment­s, we recruited college students, online samples, strangers in a public park and even executives at financial services firms, and similar patterns played out within each group. Whether you’re an extrovert or an introvert, a man or a woman, you’re likely to underestim­ate how good you’ll feel after having a deep conversati­on with a stranger. The same results even occurred in conversati­ons over Zoom.

In one telling demonstrat­ion, we had some people engage in both a relatively shallow and comparativ­ely deeper conversati­on. People expected that they would prefer a shallow conversati­on to the deeper one before they took place. After the interactio­ns occurred, they reported the opposite.

Moreover, the participan­ts consistent­ly told us that they wished they could have deeper conversati­ons more often in their everyday lives.

The problem, then, is not a lack of interest in having more meaningful conversati­ons. It’s the misguided pessimism about how these interactio­ns will play out.

It’s possible, though, to learn from these positive experience­s.

Think of the trepidatio­n kids have of diving into the deep end of a swimming pool. The uneasiness is often unwarrante­d: Once they take the plunge, they end up having a lot more fun than they did in shallower waters.

Our data suggests that something similar can happen when it comes to topics of conversati­on. You might feel nervous before starting a deeper conversati­on with someone you barely know; yet once you do, you might actually enjoy digging a little deeper than you typically do.

The broader takeaway of our work is that these miscalibra­ted expectatio­ns can lead many people to be not quite social enough for their own good and the wellbeing of others.

Having deeper conversati­ons joins a growing list of opportunit­ies for social engagement — including expressing gratitude, sharing compliment­s and reaching out and talking to an old friend — that end up feeling a lot better than we might

think.

 ?? Getty Images file photo ?? In a dozen experiment­s, participan­ts underestim­ated how much they would enjoy talking with strangers.
Getty Images file photo In a dozen experiment­s, participan­ts underestim­ated how much they would enjoy talking with strangers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States