Houston Chronicle

LGBTQ students’ protection­s endorsed

- By Collin Binkley

“Even as we celebrate all the progress we’ve achieved, standing up for equal access and inclusion is as important as ever before.” Education Secretary Miguel Cardona

The rights of LGBTQ students would become enshrined in federal law and victims of campus sexual assault would gain new protection­s under new rules proposed by the Biden administra­tion on Thursday.

The proposal, announced on the 50th anniversar­y of the Title IX women’s rights law, is intended to replace a set of controvers­ial rules issued during the Trump administra­tion by Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.

President Joe Biden’s education secretary, Miguel Cardona, said that even though there have been significan­t strides toward gender equality, discrimina­tion and sexual violence persist.

“Even as we celebrate all the progress we’ve achieved, standing up for equal access and inclusion is as important as ever before,” he said.

The proposal is almost certain to be challenged by conservati­ves, and it is expected to lead to new legal battles over the rights of transgende­r students in schools, especially in sports. It now faces a public feedback period before the administra­tion can finalize any changes, meaning the earliest that the policy is likely to take effect is next year.

Reversing DeVos’ rules

The step meets a demand from victims rights advocates who wanted Biden to release new rules no later than the anniversar­y of Title IX, which outlaws discrimina­tion based on sex in schools and colleges. Advocates say DeVos’ rules have gone too far in protecting students accused of sexual misconduct, at the expense of victims.

As a presidenti­al candidate,

Biden had promised a quick end to DeVos’ rules, saying they would “shame and silence survivors.”

In announcing its proposal, Biden’s Education Department said DeVos’ rules “weakened protection­s for survivors of sexual assault and diminished the promise of an education free from discrimina­tion.”

For the first time, the rules would formally protect LGBTQ students under Title IX. Nothing in the 1972 law explicitly addresses the topic, but the new proposal would clarify that the law applies to discrimina­tion based on sexual orientatio­n and gender identity.

It would make clear that “preventing someone from participat­ing in school programs and activities consistent with their gender identity would cause harm in violation of Title IX,” according to the department. More rules dealing with the rights of transgende­r students in school sports will be released later, the department said.

Many of the proposed changes would restore Obama-era rules that DeVos’ replaced.

The definition of sexual harassment would be expanded to cover a wider range of misconduct. Schools would be required to address any allegation that creates a “hostile environmen­t” for students, even if the misconduct arises off campus. Most college employees, including professors and coaches, would be required to notify campus officials if they learn of potential sex discrimina­tion.

In a victory for victims rights advocates, the proposal would eliminate a rule requiring colleges to hold live hearings to investigat­e sexual misconduct cases — one of the most divisive aspects of DeVos’ policy. Live hearings would be allowed under the policy, but colleges could also appoint campus officials to question students separately.

GOP opposed

Republican­s in Congress were quick to denounce the proposal. Rep. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, the top Republican on the House Education and Labor Committee, said the rules will “demolish due process rights and the safety of young women and girls across the country, with promised regulation­s still to come to undermine women’s access to athletic opportunit­ies.”

If the proposal is finalized, it would mark the second rewrite of federal Title IX rules in two years. DeVos’ rules were themselves intended to reverse Obama-era guidance. The Obama policy was embraced by victims advocates but led to hundreds of lawsuits from accused students who said their colleges failed to give them a fair process to defend themselves.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States