Imperial Valley Press

Spending other people’s money

- TOM PURCELL Tom Purcell is a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review humor columnist and is nationally syndicated exclusivel­y by Cagle Cartoons Inc. Send comments to Tom at Tom@TomPurcell.com

Ican’t blame them, really. It’s human nature to want something for nothing. speak of two tenants who recently moved into a rental unit I own. I made the mistake of renting the unit for one flat rate that included “free” utilities.

Since the tenants didn’t have to pay directly for their electricit­y usage, they cranked the air conditione­r day and night. There was no incentive for them to turn it off when they were at work during the day or away for the weekend.

Whereas the electric bill for that unit averages about $50 per month this time of the year, their electric bill came in just under $200 per month — for the simple reason that someone else (that would be me) was footing the bill.

I got to thinking about this concept recently. It is the reason our government is so bloated and our deficit and debt (we just exceeded $20 trillion in debt a few weeks ago) are so high.

This is because millions of Americans like the concept of spending other people’s money to benefit themselves — or, to be more precise, they vote for politician­s who promise to give them things using other people’s money.

Of course, our politician­s never use the word “spend” - they say “investment.” But the dough they spend has to come from somewhere. It comes from you and me - from those who work and earn - and is transferre­d to those who want stuff.

I prefer to call it what it really is: bribery. Our politician­s use our own money to promise things to other people who sell their votes to the politician­s who promise them the most.

In 1835, French political thinker Alexis de Tocquevill­e warned of the concept in “Democracy in America.”

“The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money,” he wrote.

Of course, that ship left port years ago.

ObamaCare offers a modern example of how such bribery works.

ObamaCare essentiall­y made insurers provide the goodies all of us want — coverage of pre-existing conditions, for instance — without worrying about the cost or who was going to cover it.

Now that ObamaCare premiums have exploded, millions will vote for the guy who promises to increase subsidies, paid for by “the rich,” that will reduce those premiums.

“Other people will be made to pay my bills” is way easier for people to grasp than “we need to dramatical­ly reform and simplify our incredibly complex health-care system to unleash competitio­n and efficiency among private insurers and health-care providers to dramatical­ly reduce costs and make insurance affordable.”

That’s a key reason many politician­s want the government running everything. During election season, all they need to do to win is to promise more goodies — and proclaim that their opponents plan to cut them.

Such politician­s never tell you that, to fund hundreds of new bribes, taxes will have to go up. Or that, to fund the dozens of unsustaina­ble programs we already have, taxes will have to go up more. Economic growth will suffer and, ultimately, everyone will suffer.

But nobody seems to care about that. That is, too few people have the desire or the ability to understand that our government cannot continue spending recklessly forever — we cannot keep borrowing and piling on debt without massive consequenc­es.

To borrow from the late U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, sooner or later, our politician­s will run out of other people’s money.

I learned my lesson. Never again will I include “free electric” in my rental contracts.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States