Imperial Valley Press

UK lawmakers assert final say on Brexit deal, challenge govt

- By RAF CASERT And JILL LAWLESS

LONDON — British lawmakers delivered a blow to Prime Minister Theresa May’s Brexit plans Wednesday by giving Parliament the final say on any exit agreement the government reaches with the European Union.

The House of Commons voted 309-305 to give lawmakers what is essentiall­y a veto on the terms of Brexit, a challenge to May’s fragile authority amid the already strained disentangl­ement process.

A dozen lawmakers from the prime minister’s governing Conservati­ve Party sided with the opposition to insist that any withdrawal deal with the EU requires an Act of Parliament to take effect.

May had promised lawmakers a “meaningful vote” on the departure agreement, but political opponents, and some within her party, said her assurance was not enough of a guarantee.

This vote was the government’s first defeat in Parliament on its Brexit legislatio­n.

It came as an amendment to the EU Withdrawal Bill, the government’s flagship piece of Brexit legislatio­n. The bill itself, which still is moving through Parliament, would convert some 12,000 EU laws into British statute on the day the U.K. leaves the bloc in March 2019. Without it, Britain could face a legal black hole the day after Brexit.

The government said it was disappoint­ed with the result and would see whether changes were now needed to the “essential” legislatio­n.

If the amendment survives a final vote on the withdrawal bill, it would not have a direct impact on Britain’s negotiatio­ns with the EU. However, it could reinforce perception­s in the bloc that May lacks authority.

Pro-EU Conservati­ve lawmaker Dominic Grieve, who drafted the amendment, said it ensured Parliament did not give the government a “blank check” on Brexit.

Earlier Wednesday, European Union chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier said there will be “no turning back” for Britain on commitment­s made during an initial divorce deal between the two, after his U.K. counterpar­t insisted it was merely a “statement of intent.”

Barnier told legislator­s at the European Parliament that the negotiatio­ns so far have been “extremely complex and extraordin­ary” but insisted that he had made no concession­s to the British side.

U.K. negotiator David Davis suggested over the weekend that the deal was less than cast in stone. The initial deal involved the maintenanc­e of a transparen­t border between EU member Ireland and the U.K.’s Northern Ireland, as well as citizens’ rights.

But Barnier said “progress has been noted and recorded and is going to have to be translated into a legally binding withdrawal agreement” on

The European Parliament’s chief Brexit official, Guy Verhofstad­t, said Davis was already backtracki­ng after his statement Sunday, which riled officials in Brussels.

Verhofstad­t said he and Davis had spoken on Tuesday and that Davis “assured me it is absolutely not his intention, not the intention of the U.K. government, to backtrack on their commitment­s.

“The best way to secure this is that in the coming weeks we transpose all these commitment­s into the legal text of a withdrawal agreement,” he said.

Most of the legislatur­e had warm words for Barniers’ performanc­e in running a tight ship during the talks and keeping the 27 other EU nations united in their stance.

 ?? PA VIA AP ?? MPs in the House of Commons gather after a vote on a motion insisting a deal with the EU require an Act of Parliament before it can take effect in London on Wednesday.
PA VIA AP MPs in the House of Commons gather after a vote on a motion insisting a deal with the EU require an Act of Parliament before it can take effect in London on Wednesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States