Democrats see partisanship in GOP Pennsylvania district map
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Pennsylvania Democrats on Saturday described a revised congressional district map being proposed by Republican leaders as too partisan, citing as evidence the results of the 2016 presidential campaign.
A spokesman for state House Democrats said their analysis of the GOP proposal indicates Republican President Donald Trump would have collected more votes in 13 of 18 districts, one more than he actually did win.
The Legislature’s two top-ranking Republicans unveiled their proposed map late Friday, three weeks after the five Democrats on the state Supreme Court declared the existing map unconstitutional because it put partisan aims above other map-drawing criteria.
Drew Crompton, a senior Senate Republican aide involved in developing the map, said voter performance was not considered for any candidate.
“I don’t know how many districts Trump won” or how any district performed for any candidate, Crompton said. “We did not run that data.”
Trump beat Democrat Hillary Clinton in Pennsylvania by less than 1 percentage point, a key victory in his electoral coalition.
The Democratic voters who successfully challenged the state’s congressional district map in state court called the Republicans’ proposed replacement a “naked partisan gerrymander.” They said Saturday the map would divide populous southeastern counties for partisan gain.
The map by House Speaker Mike Turzai and Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati would reduce dozens of municipal or county divisions while keeping nearly 70 percent of state residents in their existing districts. The Turzai-Scarnati map would split 32 counties and municipalities, 62 fewer than the 2011 map.
“The districts are compact. The districts limit splits dramatically. The districts comply with the Voting Rights Act. Confusion for voters has been minimized,” Crompton said.
Under terms of a Jan. 22 court order, Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf has until Thursday to tell the justices if the General Assembly has produced a map he supports. If not, the court has indicated it may develop one of its own.