Imperial Valley Press

Some fear California drought cuts could erase water rights

- BY JONATHAN J. COOPER

SACRAMENTO — A proposal to make California’s drought-era water restrictio­ns permanent could allow the state to chip away at long-held water rights in an unpreceden­ted power grab, representa­tives from water districts and other users told regulators Tuesday.

Members of the state Water Resources Control Board delayed a decision about whether to bring back what had been temporary water bans from California’s drought, spanning 2013 to 2017. The plan is part of an effort to make water conservati­on a way of life, with climate change expected to lead to longer, more severe droughts.

It comes after U.S. officials declared that nearly half the state, all of it in the south, is back in drought just months after emerging from it.

Officials from several irrigation and water agencies said the restrictio­ns are reasonable, but not the plan to impose them under the state Constituti­on’s prohibitio­n on the “waste or unreasonab­le use” of water. That would create a slippery slope of allowing the board to repeatedly chip away at California’s historic protection of water rights for landowners, they said.

“Erratic individual­s can occupy great positions of power in government, and you had better believe they will occupy your chair someday,” said Jackson Minasian, an attorney for Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Co. “Their view of what is ‘waste and unreasonab­le use’ will be radically different than yours.”

Some water users also said permanent mandates would be too rigid in a sprawling state with needs that vary by region.

The restrictio­ns, punishable by a $500 fine, include prohibitio­ns on watering lawns so much that the water flows into the street, using a hose to wash down sidewalks or using a hose without an automatic shut-off nozzle to wash cars. A final decision is now expected by April 17.

Hotels would have to ask guests if they really need their towels and sheets washed each day. Running an ornamental fountain without a recirculat­ing system would be barred, as would watering outside within 48 hours of a good rain. Another measure would give cities and counties until 2025 to stop watering ordinary street medians.

Restaurant­s would be allowed to serve water only on request if the governor declares a drought emergency.

Water officials expect neighbors to be responsibl­e for detecting and reporting most of the wasteful water use, and they have no plans to add more enforcemen­t officers if the permanent restrictio­ns are adopted.

Generally, first-time offenders would get warnings, while repeat offenders risk fines.

Environmen­tal groups urged officials to crack down more aggressive­ly on wasteful water use rather than rely on policies that encourage neighbors to develop good practices.

Water board chairwoman Felicia Marcus said the restrictio­ns are hardly a long-term solution to California’s drought problems but “the least we should do.”

 ??  ?? In this May 6, 2015, file photo, local resident Martha Mattison (left) helps out her son, Jacob with his dog walking business, as they walk past recently installed synthetic grass, seen at right in Garden Grove. AP PHOTO/DAMIAN DOVARGANES
In this May 6, 2015, file photo, local resident Martha Mattison (left) helps out her son, Jacob with his dog walking business, as they walk past recently installed synthetic grass, seen at right in Garden Grove. AP PHOTO/DAMIAN DOVARGANES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States