Imperial Valley Press

High cost of doing business?

CANNABIS TAX PLAN SET FOR JUNE 5 VOTE

- BY EDWIN DELGADO | Staff Writer

EL CENTRO — A series of taxes on the local cannabis industry will be up for county voter approval June 5. The Imperial County Board of Supervisor­s on Tuesday approved a resolution to establish general taxes on the developing industry. The proposed taxes are 8 percent on retail sales, a 5 percent tax on the gross revenue in manufactur­ing and a land tax for cultivatio­n facilities. As proposed, the land tax would start at $15 per square foot as of Jan. 1, and then rise to $20 per square foot in 2020 and $25 in 2022.

Since the intent is to pass a general tax, the revenue generated would be placed under the county’s general fund and can be spent for unrestrict­ed general revenue purposes.

Although the county had the option to put in place an excise tax for a specific use, the idea was not deemed appropriat­e by the ad hoc committee led by Supervisor Luis Plancarte. That’s because an excise tax would have required a twothirds majority vote to be adopted rather than the simple majority required for a general tax.

Concerns

Planning and Developmen­t Director Jim Minnick told the board during the meeting that some have expressed concerns to him over the land tax rising to $25 per square foot in four years.

He said interested applicants are concerned that as the availabili­ty of the product increases, its value may decrease, making the land tax a bit too high, which they believe could be detrimenta­l for the developmen­t of the industry in the Imperial Valley.

Minnick said that fee has made some investors anxious and noted the rest of the fees have not been seen as an issue.

“The majority of what we’ve been hearing is that $25 is exceedingl­y expensive,” Minnick said. “Some (jurisdicti­ons) have as high as $25. The feedback that we are getting is that the $25 is in excess of the ability to sustain their company.”

Under the County’s guidelines, no cultivatio­n facility should exceed 22,000 square feet.

A facility of that size would pay a total of $330,000 for the land tax next year.

Starting in 2020, that number would go up to $440,000 and would cap at

$550,000 by 2022.

Update on applicatio­ns

Last year, the board approved issuing up to five licenses for virtual retail of cannabis with delivery service, up to five licenses for wholesale distributi­on operations and a single medical marijuana storefront with a delivery operation.

Minnick told the board the county received 26 license applicatio­ns during the applicatio­n period. He said the county received 10 applicatio­ns for a medicinal marijuana facility, seven for virtual retail licenses and six for wholesale distributi­on.

A lottery process is expected to take place in March to determine which of the applicants will move forward.

In order to take part in the lottery process, an applicatio­n needs to be found complete and consistent with county and state regulation­s pertaining to zoning, site control and financial ability.

Those selected in the lottery will move forward in the applicatio­n process but still will need to meet all establishe­d requiremen­ts before the issuance of a license.

Another concern raised by some applicants is that although the county will approve the virtual retail sale of recreation­al marijuana, no local city currently allows it, therefore putting the industry in uncharted territory.

Minnick told the board that by banning retail sales of cannabis within their jurisdicti­on, cities also effectivel­y banned the delivery of cannabis.

Minnick said these virtual dispensari­es will have to find a way to deliver to a physical address within the unincorpor­ated areas of the county to avoid breaking the law. The county last year voted not to allow physical recreation­al marijuana dispensari­es.

“Our statement (to applicants) would be that you can only deliver where you legally are allowed to deliver pursuant to state regulation­s,” Minnick said.

Despite the concerns, the board voted unanimousl­y to approve the resolution, and the fate of the proposed taxes rests with voters.

 ?? ADOBE STOCK PHOTO ??
ADOBE STOCK PHOTO
 ??  ??
 ?? SOURCE: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATIN­GS.COM/SITE/USPF/CANNABIS ??
SOURCE: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATIN­GS.COM/SITE/USPF/CANNABIS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States