From a disgruntled gentleman
As a disgruntled gentleman, I must reply to May 20’s editorial (“Thank you, sir. May I have another?”).
Our new editor has taken it upon himself to point out the public’s shortcomings when it comes to apathy toward money wasted by the county. Even though he is correct and is doing his job, I would caution the newbie to be mindful about the adage about pointing the accusing finger of blame. When pointing the accusing finger of blame, remember, that while one finger is pointing away, three fingers are pointing back at you.
Has the Imperial Valley Press fulfilled its role of keeping the public fully informed?
Has the Imperial Valley Press questioned or challenged the information provided by our public officials?
Has the Imperial Valley Press provided an open forum for the community to exchange ideas and opinions?
Has the Imperial Valley Press been accommodating to the public when letters are submitted to the editor for publication?
Based on my own experience the last few years, I have doubts and concerns. Two years ago, I submitted two stories for consideration in a fourmonth period that were not printed. Nor did I receive an explanation as to why. Finally, after many failed attempts to find out why, I decided to take action. I produced signage on my yellow pickup that stated, “Censorship no Bueno” and I made a sign to carry that stated, “Censorship cowards of the press.” For one hour over a twoday period, I protested at the office of the Imperial Valley Press. During the second day of protest, I was approached by an employee who stated that the publisher would like to have a meeting. The meeting went well, and the letters were printed over the next two weeks. The letters were information type and contained no political agenda.
I figured our working relationship was re-established. I was wrong. Last September, the IV Press printed an editorial that suggested a legal and constitutionally protected activity under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution should be restricted. I was flabbergasted that a news-gathering agency like the IV Press would suggest restricting the ability of others to gather information about public officials. I submitted a rebuttal to the editorial. Even though the IV Press openly invites readers to respond to its editorials, no response was printed. I re-submitted the rebuttal every month for the next four months with no success. The irony and hypocrisy demonstrated by the IV Press was so evident that its own words diluted the attempted logic of its misguided editorial.
Mr. Editor, I applaud and welcome your concern about our apathy when it comes to the county wasting money. While hoping your concern will motivate change, I also hope you get your house in order.