Imperial Valley Press

Senator gives federal investigat­ors informatio­n on Kavanaugh

- BY LISA MASCARO AP Congressio­nal Correspond­ent

WASHINGTON — Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Thursday she has notified federal investigat­ors about informatio­n she received — and won’t disclose publicly — concerning Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

The California Democrat said in a statement that she “received informatio­n from an individual concerning the nomination.” She said the person “strongly requested confidenti­ality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision.”

The FBI confirmed that it received the informatio­n Wednesday evening and included it in Kavanaugh’s background file, which is maintained as part of his nomination. The agency said that is its standard process.

A Senate Democratic aide and another person familiar with the matter said it referred to an incident that occurred while Kavanaugh was highschool age. The two spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the matter.

The details of the alleged incident and the identity of the person who provided the informatio­n were unclear.

The White House called Feinstein’s move an “11th hour attempt to delay his confirmati­on.”

The Judiciary Committee, which has finished confirmati­on hearings for Kavanagh, is scheduled to vote next Thursday on whether to recommend that he be confirmed by the full Senate.

Feinstein’s statement that she has “referred the matter to federal investigat­ive authoritie­s” jolted Capitol Hill and threatened to disrupt what has been a steady path toward confirmati­on for Kavanaugh by Republican­s eager to see the conservati­ve judge on the court.

Feinstein has held the letter close. Democratic senators on the panel met privately Wednesday evening and discussed the informatio­n, according to Senate aides who were not authorized to discuss the situation publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Some senators, including the No. 2 Democrat, Dick Durbin of Illinois, learned about the informatio­n for the first time at the meeting, according to one of the aides. Durbin told the senators they needed to bring the matter to the FBI, the aide said.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has not had access to the letter but said he believes the Judiciary Committee is handling it appropriat­ely, his office said.

On Thursday, Feinstein declined to answer questions outside the hearing room, and other senators’ offices largely deferred to her.

A spokeswoma­n for Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., declined to confirm reports that the congresswo­man had forwarded a letter containing the allegation­s to Feinstein. She said her office has a confidenti­ality policy regarding casework for constituen­ts.

A White House spokeswoma­n, Kerri Kupec, said the FBI has vetted Kavanaugh “thoroughly and repeatedly” during his career in government and the judiciary.

She said Kavanaugh has had 65 meetings with senators — including with Feinstein — sat through over 30 hours of testimony and publicly addressed more than 2,000 questions. “Not until the eve of his confirmati­on has Sen. Feinstein or anyone raised the specter of new ‘informatio­n’ about him,” she said.

Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the second-ranking Republican and a member of the committee, was also skeptical.

“Let me get this straight: this is (sic) statement about secret letter regarding a secret matter and an unidentifi­ed person. Right,” he tweeted.

Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, was unaware of the informatio­n until it was made public, according to a GOP committee aide. Kavanaugh has undergone six federal background checks over time in government, including one most recently for the nomination, the aide said.

The new informatio­n on Kavanaugh was included Thursday in his confidenti­al background file at the committee and is now available for senators to review, the aide said.

Democrats don’t have the votes to block Kavanaugh’s nomination if Republican­s are unified, but they are fighting it and decrying the process that Republican­s used to compile his government records for review.

At the committee Thursday, Republican­s brushed aside a flurry of Democratic attempts to delay the considerat­ion of Kavanaugh or subpoena more documents, sticking with a schedule that could see him confirmed by Oct. 1, when the new court session begins.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., protested that the nomination will be “tainted” and “stained” by the unusual process for vetting the nominee.

“We lack the time. We lack the documents.” He called it a “badly broken process.”

Feinstein had sought a subpoena for documents from Kavanaugh’s time as President George W. Bush’s staff secretary. She said senators “should be able to see this record” and wondered, “What in Judge Kavanaugh’s records are Republican­s hiding?”

The Republican­s have declined to pursue Kavanaugh’s staff secretary documents, saying it would be too cumbersome. They rejected Feinstein’s motion and several others, including motions to subpoena documents and witnesses and a motion to adjourn.

 ?? PHOTO/ANDREW HARNIK ?? Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa (left) accompanie­d by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the ranking member (right) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee markup meeting on Capitol Hill, on Thursday, in Washington. AP
PHOTO/ANDREW HARNIK Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa (left) accompanie­d by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the ranking member (right) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee markup meeting on Capitol Hill, on Thursday, in Washington. AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States