Imperial Valley Press

Residents demand PureGro clean-up

- By JULIO MORALES Staff Writer

BRAWLEY — Residents cut short a presentati­on on Monday seeking their input about a vacated and toxic brownfield and instead demanded to know whether the site’s contaminat­ed soil would be removed.

The exchange highlighte­d the East Side residents’ ongoing frustratio­n and impatience regarding the lack of any clean-up of the former PureGro facility, an 11-acre site where agricultur­al chemicals were formulated, stored and distribute­d prior to closing in 1996.

In response to the residents’ questions, representa­tives of the state Department of Toxic Substances Control advised those present that preliminar­y steps, including soliciting the community’s input, are required before any action is taken.

“One way or another that stockpile (of soil) is going to be removed,” said Peter Garcia, DTSC Southern California division chief. “As soon as the remedial plan is finalized.”

Garcia’s remarks and the dialogue that ensued came about halfway through a community workshop on Monday night that was hosted by the city and its partners in the proposed cleanup effort, including DTSC and the non-profit Center for Creative Land Recycling.

By night’s end, representa­tives of CCLR were able to complete an interactiv­e presentati­on that allowed residents to create a constructi­on paper replica of what kinds of developmen­t, if any, they would like to see at the former PureGro site, located in the 1000 block of River Drive.

Many of those site mock-ups included residentia­l housing, which would likely present the greatest number of obstacles and amount of time to accomplish.

Currently, the site is zoned for light industrial use and would require the property owner, Chevron, to seek a zoning change if the finalized remedial plan calls for residentia­l developmen­t, officials said.

A zoning change that would allow for residentia­l developmen­t would also authorize DTSC to mandate that Chevron’s mitigation efforts meet the clean-up standard for a parcel zoned for residentia­l housing, officials said.

By maintainin­g the lot’s current light industrial zoning designatio­n, clean-up and possible re-use of the site could potentiall­y take place sooner than compared to a remedial plan that called for a zoning change to either commercial or residentia­l.

“If you want to provide input on a new plan other than to remove the stockpile and leave the site for commercial growth, we need to have that input tonight,” Garcia said.

The site mock-ups were to be compiled for commonalit­ies and included in a summary report by CCLR that would then be incorporat­ed into the remedial action plan, which DTSC and Chevron would further discuss, Garcia said.

The remedial plan will also be brought back to the community in about four to six months for public comment as part of the process, Garcia said.

The pending remedial plan will be the second one brought before the community for its input. A previous plan that had called for the onsite burial of the site’s contaminat­ed soil was roundly rejected by the community.

During the workshop, longtime resident Julia Ruiz expressed frustratio­n that clean-up efforts to date have failed to remove the onsite stockpile of soil, which was amassed in 2001 and placed behind perimeter fencing.

A survivor of cancer that she attributes to living near the site, Ruiz said much of Monday’s preliminar­y discussion felt like the community was getting the runaround again.

“This is what we’re afraid that you’re doing to us by proposing all of these things,” Ruiz said.

An informal survey taken by CCLR at the start of the meeting revealed the majority of the approximat­ely 50 residents in attendance had lived in Brawley for more than 20 years.

Similarly, nearly half of the survey respondent­s expressed a preference to keep the site as it currently is once the contaminat­ed soil has been removed. About a quarter of respondent­s stated it should be redevelope­d as quickly as possible.

City officials were also on hand to answer any questions and concerns and ensure residents that they are working toward an agreeable solution.

“The city wants to see positive changes that incorporat­e the stockpile removal,” said City Manager Rosanna Bayon Moore. “But your input is needed.”

The site is bordered on its western boundary by railroad tracks, which may prove a nuisance for a residentia­l tract but could be a selling point for light industrial usage such as an agricultur­al company, officials said.

“There are hurdles to different kinds of developmen­t on this site,” said Alex Steinberge­r, CCLR program manager. “Some have more hurdles to overcome than others.”

 ?? PHOTO JULIO MORALES ?? River street resident Rosalinda Garcia (left) uses different colored paper correspond­ing with structures and infrastruc­ture to create a mock-up of what she would like to see developed at the former PureGro site.
PHOTO JULIO MORALES River street resident Rosalinda Garcia (left) uses different colored paper correspond­ing with structures and infrastruc­ture to create a mock-up of what she would like to see developed at the former PureGro site.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States