Imperial Valley Press

Second judge blocks request to change lawyers in census case

- BY MICHAEL BALSAMO

WASHINGTON — A second federal judge on Wednesday rejected the Justice Department’s plan to switch up the legal team fighting to include a citizenshi­p question on the 2020 census.

The latest order , handed down by U.S. District Judge George Hazel in Maryland, put up yet another roadblock as the Trump administra­tion attempts to find a legal pathway forward to including the question — even after the Supreme Court barred it, at least temporaril­y. The order came just a day after another federal judge in Manhattan issued a similar ruling , saying the Justice Department can’t replace nine lawyers so late in the dispute without satisfacto­rily explaining why it’s doing so.

The rulings deal a significan­t blow to the Justice Department and Attorney General William Barr, who had personally approved changing up the litigation team. A third federal judge, who is hearing another census case in San Francisco, has yet to rule on the Justice Department’s motion to change its lawyers.

Justice Department spokeswoma­n Kelly Laco declined to comment on Wednesday’s ruling.

The government has already begun the process of printing the census questionna­ire without that question. Over the last week, the Trump administra­tion has sent mixed signals — first saying the question was o before the president tweeted that his administra­tion was “absolutely moving forward” with e orts to include it.

Barr said in an interview earlier this week that he sees a legal pathway forward and that the administra­tion would take action in the coming days that he believes will allow the government to add the controvers­ial census query.

The new team came about after a top Justice Department civil attorney who was leading the litigation e ort, James Burnham, told Barr that multiple people on the team preferred not to continue, the attorney general said. Burnham told him it would be a “logical breaking point” because a new position was going to be argued soon, he added.

In the Maryland case, the judge said he agreed that Barr has the authority to assign attorneys to handle specific cases, but warned that it would “not create a clean slate” and that any new team must be prepared to answer questions about prior statements and court filings. The judge said the Justice Department could refile its motion, but the court documents would need to include additional informatio­n about how the agency could ensure an orderly transition between lawyers and prove it wouldn’t cause any delay in the case.

 ??  ?? Barr
Barr

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States