GOP congressman set to go to trial weeks before 2020 primary

SAN DIEGO (AP) — U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter won’t go on trial until next year on corruption charges that involve the spending of campaign cash on vacations, extramarital affairs and other items, a U.S. judge decided Tuesday.

U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Whelan changed the trial date from Sept. 10 to Jan. 14 after defense attorneys raised questions about whether an appeals court must first consider their motion to dismiss the case against the California Republican.

Whelan considered the motion last month and refused the request. Hunter’s attorneys are appealing that decision and plan to ask the appeals court to dismiss the charges.

Hunter attended the Tuesday hearing but did not speak.

He and his wife were indicted a year ago after authorities said they used more than $250,000 in campaign funds for personal expenses ranging from groceries to golf trips and family vacations.

Prosecutors also say Hunter spent campaign money on extramarital affairs.

The Marine combat veteran has pleaded not guilty to all the counts against him. Margaret Hunter has pleaded guilty to one corruption count and agreed to cooperate with investigators.

Defense lawyers told Whelan last month that the congressman was protected from prosecution under a section of the U.S. Constitution that involves the performance of legislative activity.

They called a 2015 trip Hunter made to Italy a legislative act. Whelan dismissed the argument, saying it was clearly a family vacation.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has not decided yet whether to accept the appeal, but it usually doesn’t rule on a criminal case before a trial has concluded.

In Hunter’s case, the judges are allowing his attorneys to show why the court should make an exception. The 9th Circuit set a Sept. 6 deadline for the defense to submit their arguments, and the prosecution can file its response after that.

Prosecutors say the appeal is a tactic to delay the trial and they have asked the court to dismiss it. They plan to file an additional motion to ask the appeals court to allow the trial to proceed while it weighs the appeal of Whelan’s July 8 ruling to prevent further delays if a decision is not made before Jan. 14.