Imperial Valley Press

Proper anticoagul­ant therapy for protein deficiency

- KEITH ROACH, M.D. Dr. Roach regrets that he is unable to answer individual letters, but will incorporat­e them in the column whenever possible. Readers may email questions to ToYourGood­Health@med.cornell.edu or send mail to 628 Virginia Dr., Orlando, FL 3

DEAR DR. ROACH: Many members of my family and I have protein S deficiency and are prescribed warfarin.

We are aware of the effects that food, exercise and medicines have in reaction to warfarin. Several of us have INR meters and do our testing at home.

I have been on warfarin since 1991, with only a couple of clots, usually when dehydrated.

My grandson was on Eliquis, and had a DVT despite this, so he is back on warfarin. It is my understand­ing that none of the other “blood thinners” are testable to determine INR.

Why do doctors prescribe them for protein S deficiency? Aren’t they approved just for atrial fibrillati­on?

Why would a doctor prescribe Lovenox and warfarin together for over a year for my grandson? Hematologi­sts, not internists, should be the doctors to treat protein S deficiency. -- A.C.G.

ANSWER: Most people have probably not heard of protein S or protein C, but these are important regulators of the body’s capacity to form a clot. Unlike the other clotting factors, these act AGAINST the blood clotting cascade and so help prevent inappropri­ate clotting in the body.

When people have low levels of either of these proteins, they are at risk for developing a blood clot, such as a deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.

People with protein S deficiency are treated with anticoagul­ants if they have a clot, but are generally not treated with anticoagul­ants if they have not had a clot, even if they have known deficiency.

However, some people with protein S deficiency but no history of abnormal clotting may be given anticoagul­ants before surgery, for example, especially if there is a strong family history of abnormal clots.

The choice of anticoagul­ants includes both warfarin and direct oral anticoagul­ants such as apixaban (Eliquis). One major advantage to apixaban and similar drugs is that routine blood testing is not required.

They do not work the same way warfarin does, so checking the INR (internatio­nal normalized ratio) is not appropriat­e.

Head-to-head testing of warfarin and the newer agents like apixaban has shown that apixaban is at least as good as warfarin.

Both apixaban and warfarin are Food and Drug Administra­tion-indicated for treatment of deep venous thrombosis, but neither is specifical­ly indicated in people with protein S deficiency.

Anticoagul­ants sometimes fail. If a person does develop a clot on one treatment, his or her physician may choose a different treatment, such as apixaban for a person who developed a clot on warfarin, or vice versa.

Low molecular weight heparin, such as Lovenox, is an injection medication seldom used for prolonged periods of time, such as the year your grandson took it.

But there have been cases. I agree with you that difficult or complicate­d cases are ideally managed by a hematologi­st when available.

DEAR DR. ROACH: In your recent column on mumps, I wondered if a person had mumps only on one side, is that person still susceptibl­e? I’m 80 and had them on one side 48 years ago.

I have two 6-year-old grandchild­ren who I see a few times a year. Luckily the kids get their shots regularly. -- B.I.

ANSWER: Mumps usually causes swelling in both parotid glands, the large salivary glands in the cheeks, but 25% will have involvemen­t only on one side.

A history of disease, one-sided or both, virtually guarantees immunity for life, but there are rare cases of people developing mumps after natural infection.

This is extremely rare and may reflect a noninfecti­ous immune response or misdiagnos­is rather than failure of the immune system.

You and your grandchild­ren are almost certainly safe from infection.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States