Imperial Valley Press

Affirmativ­e action effort in California faces uphill battle

-

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A national awakening on race has driven a well-funded campaign in California to reinstate affirmativ­e action in public hiring, contractin­g and college admissions, with voters deciding Tuesday whether to allow the nation’s most populated state to grant preferenti­al treatment based on race and gender.

But public polling indicates that Propositio­n 16 is struggling, suggesting that voters may not be ready to repeal a quarter- century-old ban on affirmativ­e action. Supporters have raised $ 31 million and include chambers of commerce, profession­al sports, tech companies and Democratic leaders. They say affirmativ­e action programs are critical to undoing generation­s of systemic racism and sexism that holds back people of color and women.

In contrast, opponents have raised $1.6 million, fueled by smaller donations from a grassroots network that includes Chinese immigrants worried that public universiti­es will bypass Asian American applicants with higher scores and grades in favor of lower-scoring African American and Latino students. They say discrimina­tion should stay illegal.

“Its prospects are not great,” said Mark DiCamillo, director of a poll conducted by the Institute of Government­al Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. “My only explanatio­n is that it’s fallen between the cracks.”

The survey of likely voters released Oct. 26 shows 49% opposed and 38% in favor, with greater support in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles but trailing everywhere else. A poll by the Public Policy Institute of California indicated similar trends.

The measure is polling evenly among Latinos and women, the survey shows. Democrats and African Americans appear to be supporting it and there is less support among men and white people, the poll suggests.

Angel Chavez, 45, a San Diego tattoo artist and President Donald Trump supporter, said he voted against the affirmativ­e action measure. “I’m Mexican,” he said. “Yet I’ve never felt racism. If I don’t get a job, it’s because somebody was more qualified.”

But in San Francisco, Harry Rochester, who voted for Democrat Joe Biden for president, said he was sad when voters banned affirmativ­e action.

“Being an African American man in America, I don’t think I would have gotten as far as I have gotten today if it wasn’t for affirmativ­e action,” said Rochester, 40.

Propositio­n 16 would repeal a ban on affirmativ­e action programs approved by voters in 1996, when the state was less diverse and more Republican. That ban was pushed in large part by Pete Wilson, the Republican governor at the time, in a campaign that galvanized voters.

DiCamillo said he’s not seeing that kind of energy for its repeal.

“I’m not faulting the campaign,” he said. “It’s among many other things that are going on in people’s lives, with the pandemic and the fires. And the presidenti­al election is sucking all the oxygen out of everything.”

Nicole Derse, a senior strategist for supporters of the measure, said advocates knew they had a lot of ground to cover quickly after California lawmakers placed the repeal on the ballot in June — a relatively short time for campaignin­g. The issue requires explaining, but she thinks the message is getting through.

“When voters actually tune in, and they look at ‘what does this ballot measure really do and who’s on what side,’ they come our way,” she said. “We feel good. It’s going to be close, and it’s going to be a lot of hustle.”

African American businessma­n Ward Connerly was an ally of then-Gov. Wilson and a University of California regent when he spearheade­d the campaign to end affirmativ­e action in 1996. Now 81, Connerly is back to defend his legacy, saying the polling shows California voters understand what’s at stake.

“Discrimina­tion is wrong no matter how you package it,” he said. “In 1996, the people of California said they did not want to use skin color and sex and your ancestry as the basis for public policymaki­ng, and they’re saying the same thing right now.”

 ?? AP Photo/Rich Pedroncell­i ?? In this June 10 file photo, Assemblywo­man Shirley Weber, D-San Diego (left) receives congratula­tions from fellow Assembly members Sharon Quirk-Silva, D-Fullerton (center) and Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, after the Assembly approved her measure to place a constituti­onal amendment on the Nov. 3, 2020 ballot to let voters decide if the state should overturn its ban on affirmativ­e action programs, at the Capitol in Sacramento, Calif.
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncell­i In this June 10 file photo, Assemblywo­man Shirley Weber, D-San Diego (left) receives congratula­tions from fellow Assembly members Sharon Quirk-Silva, D-Fullerton (center) and Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, after the Assembly approved her measure to place a constituti­onal amendment on the Nov. 3, 2020 ballot to let voters decide if the state should overturn its ban on affirmativ­e action programs, at the Capitol in Sacramento, Calif.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States