Imperial Valley Press

Lawsuit briefly blocking California assisted death law ends

- BY DON THOMPSON

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – An appeals court has formally ended a lawsuit that in 2018 temporaril­y suspended a California law that allows adults to obtain prescripti­ons for life-ending drugs, a gap that advocates blamed Thursday for a significan­t drop in its use that year.

California lawmakers made the lawsuit moot last month when they reauthoriz­ed and extended the law until 2031 while reducing the time until terminal patients projected to have six months or less to live can choose to be given fatal drugs.

The 452 terminally ill California­ns who received prescripti­ons in 2018 was down 22% from the previous year, when 577 people received the lethal drugs, before increasing to 618 who obtained the drugs in 2019.

Last year, 667 people obtained prescripti­ons. In each year, not everyone who received the drugs used them to end their lives.

Superior Court Judge Daniel Ottolia’s suspension was in place about three weeks before an appeals court reinstated the law.

A different Riverside County judge last year ruled that lawmakers in fact did act properly and that physicians who sued to block it lacked legal standing to file the challenge. But the court allowed the opponents to

refile their complaint if they could find patients to join the lawsuit.

Late last week the two sides agreed that the Legislatur­e’s recent reauthoriz­ation and extension of the law, which had been set to sunset in another five years, effectivel­y ended the legal challenge.

The 4th Appellate District Court of Appeal accepted the parties’ stipulatio­n in a one-paragraph order Monday, without comment.

Starting January 1 under the reauthoriz­ed law, the waiting period required between the time a patient makes separate

oral requests for medication will drop to 48 hours, down from the current minimum 15 days.

Katie Short, legal affairs vice president for the Life Legal Defense Foundation, said the opponents she represente­d in the lawsuit still believe it “is a deeply unjust and ill-advised law”

that initially was enacted illegally, and they will continue to seek ways to end the availabili­ty in California and elsewhere.

“We always believed the California legislatur­e lawfully passed the End of Life Option Act during a special session on healthcare because medical aid

in dying is a palliative care option to relieve intolerabl­e suffering,” Compassion & Choices chief legal advocacy officer Kevin Díaz said in a statement. “But thanks to the Legislatur­e reauthoriz­ing the law this year during a regular session, it doesn’t matter anymore.”

 ?? RICH PEDRONCELL­I/AP ?? Debbie Ziegler holds a photo of her daughter, Brittany Maynard, the California woman with brain cancer who moved to Oregon to legally end her life, during a news conference to announce the reintroduc­tion of right to die legislatio­n, Tuesday, Aug. 18, 2015, in Sacramento, Calif. An appeals court formally ended a lawsuit, Monday, that in 2018 temporaril­y suspended a law by then-Assemblywo­man Susan Talamantes Eggman, D-Stockton, left, that allows adults to obtain prescripti­ons for life-ending drugs.
RICH PEDRONCELL­I/AP Debbie Ziegler holds a photo of her daughter, Brittany Maynard, the California woman with brain cancer who moved to Oregon to legally end her life, during a news conference to announce the reintroduc­tion of right to die legislatio­n, Tuesday, Aug. 18, 2015, in Sacramento, Calif. An appeals court formally ended a lawsuit, Monday, that in 2018 temporaril­y suspended a law by then-Assemblywo­man Susan Talamantes Eggman, D-Stockton, left, that allows adults to obtain prescripti­ons for life-ending drugs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States