Imperial Valley Press

FDA restricts J&J’s COVID-19 vaccine due to blood clot risk

- BY MATTHEW PERRONE AND LAURAN NEERGAARD

WASHINGTON – U.S. regulators on Thursday strictly limited who can receive Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine due to the ongoing risk of rare but serious blood clots.

The Food and Drug Administra­tion said the shot should only be given to adults who cannot receive a different vaccine or specifical­ly request J&J’s vaccine. U.S. authoritie­s for months have recommende­d that Americans get Pfizer or Moderna shots instead of J&J’s vaccine.

FDA’s vaccine chief Dr. Peter Marks said the agency decided to restrict the vaccine after taking another look at the data on the risks of life-threatenin­g blood clots and concluding that they are limited to J&J’s vaccine.

“If there’s an alternativ­e that appears to be equally effective in preventing severe outcomes from COVID-19, we’d rather see people opting for that,” Marks said. “But we’ve been careful to say that – compared to no vaccine – this is still a better option.”

The problem occurs in the first two weeks after vaccinatio­n, he added: “So if you had the vaccine six months ago you can sleep soundly tonight knowing this isn’t an issue.”

The FDA authorized J&J’s shot in February last year for adults 18 and up.

The vaccine was initially considered an important tool in fighting the pandemic because it required only one shot. But the single-dose option proved less effective than two doses of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

In December, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommende­d Moderna and Pfizer shots over J&J’s because of its safety issues.

As of mid-March, federal scientists had identified 60 cases of the side effect, including nine that were fatal. That amounts to 3.23 blood clot cases per 1 million J&J shots. The problem is more common in women under 50, where the death rate was roughly 1 per million shots, according to Marks.

Marks said the FDA spent extra time analyzing the problem to be sure it wasn’t connected to a separate issue, such as women taking birth control medication­s that raise their risk of clotting.

The J&J vaccine will carry a starker warning about potential “long-term and debilitati­ng health consequenc­es” of the side effect.

Under the new FDA instructio­ns, J&J’s vaccine could still be given to people who had a severe allergic reaction to one of the other vaccines and can’t receive an additional dose. J&J’s shot could also be an option for people who refuse to receive the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, and therefore would otherwise remain unvaccinat­ed, the agency said.

A J&J spokesman said in an emailed statement: “Data continue to support a favorable benefit- risk profile for the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vac

cine in adults, when compared with no vaccine.”

The clotting problems first came up last spring, with the J&J shot in the U.S. and with a similar vaccine made by AstraZenec­a that is used in other countries. At that time, U.S. regulators decided the benefits of J&J’s one-anddone vaccine outweighed what was considered a very rare ri sk – as long as recipients were warned.

 ?? DAVID ZALUBOWSKI/AP ?? Vials of the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine are seen at a pharmacy in Denver on March 6, 2021.
DAVID ZALUBOWSKI/AP Vials of the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine are seen at a pharmacy in Denver on March 6, 2021.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States