Imperial Valley Press

UN demand for Gaza cease-fire provokes strongest clash between U.S. and Israel since war began

-

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The United Nations Security Council on Monday issued its first demand for a cease-fire in Gaza, with the U.S. angering Israel by abstaining from the vote. Israel responded by canceling a visit to Washington by a high-level delegation in the strongest public clash between the allies since the war began.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused the U. S. of “retreating” from a “principled position” by allowing the vote to pass without conditioni­ng the cease-fire on the release of hostages held by Hamas.

The resolution was approved 14- 0 by the 15-member council after the U.S. decided not to use its veto power on the measure, which also demanded the release of all hostages taken captive during Hamas’ Oct. 7 surprise attack in southern Israel. The chamber broke into loud applause after the vote.

The U.S. vetoed past Security Council cease-fire resolution­s in large part because of the failure to tie them directly to the release of hostages, the failure to condemn Hamas’ attacks and the delicacy of ongoing negotiatio­ns. American officials have argued that the cease-fire and hostage releases are linked, while Russia, China and many other council members favored unconditio­nal calls for cease-fires.

The resolution approved Monday demands the release of hostages but does not make it a condition for the cease-fire for the month of Ramadan, which ends in April.

Hamas said it welcomed the U.N.’s move but said the cease-fire needs to be permanent.

“We confirm our readiness to engage in an immediate prisoner exchange process that leads to the release of prisoners on both sides,” the group said. For months, the militant group has sought a deal that includes a complete end to the conflict.

The U.S. decision to abstain comes at a time of growing tensions between President Joe Biden’s administra­tion and Netanyahu over Israel’s prosecutio­n of the war, the high number of civilian casualties and the limited amounts of humanitari­an assistance reaching Gaza. The two countries have also clashed over Netanyahu’s rejection of a Palestinia­n state, Jewish settler violence against Palestinia­ns in the occupied West Bank and the expansion of settlement­s there.

In addition, the wellknown antagonism between Netanyahu and Biden — which dates from Biden’s tenure as vice president — deepened after Biden questioned Israel’s strategy in combating Hamas.

Then Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Biden ally, suggested that Netanyahu was not operating in Israel’s best interests and called for Israel to hold new elections. Biden signaled his approval of Schumer’s remarks, prompting a rebuke from Netanyahu.

During its U.S. visit, the Israeli delegation was to present White House officials with its plans for a possible ground invasion of Rafah, a city on the Egyptian border in southern Gaza where over 1 million Palestinia­n civilians have sought shelter from the war

hite House national security spokesman John Kirby said the U. S. had been “consistent” in its support for a cease-fire as part of a hostage deal. “The reason we abstained is because this resolution text did not condemn Hamas,” Kirby said.

He said the administra­tion was “very disappoint­ed” at the cancellati­on of talks on “viable alternativ­es” to a ground invasion of Rafah.

The vote came after Russia and China vetoed a U.S.-sponsored resolution Friday that would have supported “an immediate and sustained cease-fire” in the Israeli-Hamas conflict. That resolution featured a weakened link between a cease-fire and the release of hostage, leaving it open to interpreta­tion, and no time limit.

The United States warned that the resolution approved Monday could hurt negotiatio­ns to halt the hostilitie­s, raising the possibilit­y of another veto, this time by the Americans. The talks involve the U.S., Egypt and Qatar.

Because Ramadan ends April 9, the cease-fire demand would last for just two weeks, though the draft says the pause in fighting should lead “to a permanent sustainabl­e cease-fire.”

U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas- Greenfield said the resolution “spoke out in support of the ongoing diplomatic efforts,” adding that negotiator­s were “getting closer” to a deal for a cease-fire with the release of all hostages, “but we’re not there yet.”

She urged the council and U.N. members across the world to “speak out and demand unequivoca­lly that Hamas accepts the deal on the table.”

Thomas-Greenfield said the U.S. abstained because “certain edits” the U.S. requested were ignored, including adding a condemnati­on of Hamas.

The resolution, put forward by the 10 elected council members, was backed by Russia and China and the 22-nation Arab Group at the United Nations.

Algeria’s U.N. ambassador, the Arab representa­tive on the council, thanked the council for “finally” demanding a cease-fire.

“We look forward to the commitment and the compliance of the Israeli occupying power with this resolution, for them to put an end to the bloodbath without any conditions, to end the suffering of the Palestinia­n people.” he said.

Shortly before Monday’s vote, the elected members changed the final draft resolution to drop the word “permanent” from its demand that a Ramadan cease-fire should lead to a “sustainabl­e cease-fire,” apparently at the request of the United States.

Russia complained that dropping the word could allow Israel “to resume its military operation in the Gaza Strip at any moment” after Ramadan and proposed an amendment to restore it. That amendment was defeated because it failed to get the minimum nine “yes” vote — with three council members voting in favor, the United States voting against, and 11 countries abstaining.

Since the start of the war, the Security Council has adopted two resolution­s on the worsening humanitari­an situation in Gaza, but none has called for a cease-fire.

More than 32,000 Palestinia­ns in Gaza have been killed during the fighting, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. The agency does not differenti­ate between civilians and combatants in its count, but says women and children make up two-thirds of the dead.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States