Inc. (USA)

THE NEW NEW GIRLS’ CLUB

ALL-FEMALE CO-WORKING SPACES AND NETWORKING GROUPS OFFER A LOT TO INSTAGRAM. BUT WILL THEY CHANGE THE EQUATION FOR WOMEN ENTREPRENE­URS?

- BY JESSICA BENNETT PHOTOGRAPH BY KRISTA SCHLUETER

IN A SMALL LOFT SPACE in downtown New York City, 13 women sit cross-legged on cushions. A noise machine hums in the background. Small succulents and crystals line the room, along with overstuffe­d purses carrying laptops. At the center is Deborah Hanekamp— or Mama Medicine, as she is known—a healer-slash- entreprene­ur in a muumuu who is guiding the women in her studio through an afterwork meditation. The space is calming, except for the occasional sound of women arriving a bit late, finishing up business calls on cell phones. As those in the group introduce themselves, we learn there is a gastroente­rologist with a skin care line, a founder of an educationa­l center for kids, a CEO of a well-

ness concierge service, and a number of others with impressive titles. What these women have in common—other than the fact that they are moms—is that they’re also entreprene­urs.

“For me, it’s all interconne­cted. I’m workin’ and mommin’, I’m mommin’ and workin’,” says Hanekamp, who is seated facing the group. “But sometimes I need to pause and call the elements in.”

There are a few smirks at the mention of “elements”—this is New York, not Los Angeles, after all—but for the most part, the women take it in stride. They’re here by choice: part of a group called Heymama, a network for entreprene­urial-minded women who are also mothers, and are navigating the balance between the two.

Heymama began by accident, after Katya Libin and her co-founder, Amri Kibbler, met at a playdate for their 3-montholds. Neither was particular­ly excited about returning to the rigid schedule of her corporate job—sales for one, fashion for the other—and the two immediatel­y bonded over their struggle to find a community of working moms like them. They started an Instagram account to share photos of women they admired, along with photos of their children, and eventually that grew into a business: a paid membership network that counts fashion designer Rebecca Minkoff, and the founders of Gilt and Drybar, among its clientele. For $350 a year, moms get access to events, perks from other members (think: lawyers and accountant­s), and, most important, one another.

“For a lot of us, it’s like, ‘I have a babysitter for one night— I need to get my meditation, my community, and my networking in one,’ ” says Kibbler.

Ask any entreprene­ur, and most will agree: Having a network is vital to profession­al success. “It’s the number one unwritten rule,” says Sallie Krawcheck, a former Wall Street executive who is the co-founder and CEO of Ellevest, a digital financial adviser for women, and chair of an affiliated networking group called Ellevate. And yet “networking” has long been a loaded term for women. Women are twice as likely as men to report feeling excluded from the networking process, as Catalyst and other researcher­s have found.

Much of it comes down to gender. As recently as 2016, a study published in the Academy of Management Journal found that senior-level women who try to help other women at work are likely to face more negative performanc­e reviews than those who don’t (the same outcome resulted among non-white executives and employees, too). According to research by the economist Sylvia Ann Hewlett, men are 46 percent more likely to have profession­al sponsors—people who champion them at work. This is suggested, in part, because men, who still have the majority of senior roles, are often hesitant to network with women, worried that mentorship will be mistaken for a come- on. When women do have the chance to network, they are sometimes reluctant to do it, even with other women, viewing the process as inauthenti­c and transactio­nal, as research from the Harvard Business Review has found.

“Whenever I use the word ‘networking,’ women sort of run a mile,” says Dee Poku Spalding, a former marketing VP at Paramount Pictures who now runs a community for female entreprene­urs called Women Inspiratio­n & Enterprise. “And yet as someone who has spent a lot of time navigating the system, I can’t stress how important it is to build these networks. It’s what men do.”

A new wave of women’s networking may not sound like a particular­ly modern phenomenon in 2017—an age of Fearless Girl statues and Fempowerme­nt marketing. But for years, to be a successful woman in a male-dominated space meant doing the precise opposite: downplayin­g one’s gender. As the thinking went, if women were considered less equipped for these jobs, then those looking to rise up would do so by differenti­ation, sending the message: I’m not like those other women.

That attitude finally seems to be shifting. As Krawcheck explains it, there is now a sense—at least among a newer breed of entreprene­ur—that gathering in packs may help, not hinder, female entreprene­urs. “For a long time, I think we accepted the status quo that there is one seat at the table for a woman, and if someone else has it, you can’t,” Krawcheck explains. “But there seems to be a newer recognitio­n, particular­ly among young women and women in the startup world, that the table can grow. More than one female business can be funded, and, in fact, if you’re an entreprene­ur, it’s good for you.”

THIS NEW BREED of women’s network is often masked by the more palatable term “community”: part cheerleadi­ng, part career coaching, part social club—all female. Round the corner in any major city these days, and you’re likely to find one of these groups, along with promises of profession­al support (or, at the very least, a “tribe” of one’s own). There is the Wing, the co-working-space-meets-social- club co-founded by former PR strategist Audrey Gelman—a sunny, New York City loft full of lush couches and color- coordinate­d bookshelve­s where members can work, network, get a profession­al blowout, and attend events that range from conversati­ons on fertility to panels on the black female experience. It is barely a year old and has a waiting list of 8,000 women.

And the Riveter, a kind of business-minded counterpar­t to the Wing—an 11,000-square-foot workspace and community in Seattle that launched in May, targeted to female entreprene­urs and profession­als who crave more than “ping pong and beer taps” in a community space, says co-founder Amy Nelson. With just over 300 members, the Riveter hosts free business classes such as “Leveraging your LinkedIn” and “Fundraisin­g 101,” as well as yoga and meditation. There is Spalding’s WIE, a membership network that hosts small monthly salons and master classes on topics like negotiatio­n and financial literacy, as well as an annual womenonly TED- esque festival.

And there’s Krawcheck’s Ellevate Network, an 80,000woman behemoth with chapters in 40 cities, targeted at businesswo­men and entreprene­urs committed to “elevating each other” through education, conference­s, and online “jam sessions” with experts on topics like “purposeful networking.”

Others include theLi.st, a 500-woman email listserv and “visibility platform” for women in media and tech, founded by two journalist-entreprene­urs; Create & Cultivate, a conference series for women “looking to create and cultivate the career of their dreams”; Sally, a gathering of “women leaders, influencer­s, and tastemaker­s” that calls itself “a girl gang for the 21st century”; SheWorx, a “global collective” of entreprene­urs; and Girlboss Media, from author and Nasty Gal founder Sophia Amoruso, a lifestyle website and event series “for women redefining success on their own terms” that just raised $1.2 million. There are dozens more.

“It’s the formation of a new girls’ club,” says Morra Aarons-Mele, a marketing consultant who helps brands reach women. Some might call it the ripple effect of what’s happening culturally. According to the National Women’s Business Council, 89 percent of women who own companies are solo entreprene­urs. You can’t turn on the television these days without hearing another grim story of sexism in Silicon Valley or the vast disparity in its funding: Sure, women may

“Whenever I use the word ‘networking,’ women sort of run a mile. Yet I can’t stress how important it is to build these networks. It’s what men do.”

DEE POKU SPALDING, a former Paramount Pictures executive who started Women Inspiratio­n & Enterprise, a 50,000-member community for female entreprene­urs.

now start companies at five times the rate of the national average, but female-founded companies receive just

2.7 percent of all venture capital funding—and less if the founders are women of color.

When Gelman and her co-founder Lauren Kassan first conceived of the Wing, the idea was to create a place for women to stop off between meetings or take a break to charge their phones. But it wasn’t long before the two found themselves carting members to Washington, D.C., on chartered buses for the Women’s March after the election of Donald Trump. Nelson, of the Riveter, had been thinking about a womenfrien­dly co-working space for a while; the election finally pushed her to leave her day job as a corporate litigator.

“I think what is unique to this moment is that women are galvanized,” Nelson explains. “What we’re doing is taking that feeling and creating a physical space where women can come together and pursue their careers, but do it within a network. The ‘old boys’ club’ has existed and worked for hundreds of years. We’re creating a female equivalent.”

THE IDEA OF WOMEN gathering without men is nothing new. It was a women’s gathering that led to the first American women’s rights convention, in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848; meetings of small groups of women—known as “consciousn­ess-raising”—led to the women’s movement of the 1970s. As Alexis Coe, the Wing’s historiani­n-residence ( yes, that’s a thing), explains it, women’s social clubs have existed since the 1800s, with one of the first started by a group of female journalist­s who were denied entry into the New York Press Club to hear Charles Dickens speak in 1868. But it was rare that women had careers back then, and so the focus of those early clubs was largely on social reform—the creation of parks and libraries and other public services.

This new iteration of club is decidedly business-focused: to make profitable operations of both the companies of the women who join them and the networks powering them. Much like joining a gym, women can pay around $375 a month to work out of the Riveter, or $215 to be part of the Wing. Heymama’s “exclusive, curated network” makes money by charging that annual membership, along with “influencer” brand sponsorshi­ps and ticket sales from events. Since Krawcheck purchased women’s membership group 85 Broads in 2013 and rebranded it the Ellevate Network—charging as much as $1,200 a year for a membership—revenue has grown in the “strong double digits.” In five years, Spalding’s WIE has grown from a 400-person one-off event to a network of 50,000 women, without any outside capital.

“What we’re seeing with regard to women’s networks is similar to what we saw in the early days of beauty and fashion—a potentiall­y billion- dollar industry that is only just beginning to take off,” says Whitney Wolfe, the founder and CEO of Bumble, the female-centric dating app that recently

“We’ve all had that moment where your kid is screaming and you’re hiding in the closet to take a conference call. As a working mom, you need your tribe. This is that tribe.” KATYA LIBIN, co-founder of Heymama, a network for entreprene­ur-moms whose members include the founders of Gilt and Drybar. For $350 a year, members get access to, among many other things, events like the one shown here, which took place last spring at fellow member Rebecca Minkoff’s Manhattan store.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States