Inc. (USA)

PRODUCTIVI­TY TOOLKIT

- BY LEIGH BUCHANAN ILLUSTRATI­ONS BY HVASS & HANNIBAL

IN 2006, AFTER I’D WRITTEN an article about outsourcin­g R&D, I received a reader email seeking sources for a book on mobile lifestyles. My correspond­ent, a guest lecturer at Princeton, wanted to know whether I was aware of any “employees who have ‘outsourced’ themselves to create more time in their lives? In other words,” he wrote, “have you heard of any employees who have paid a freelancer to perform their job function unbeknowns­t to the boss?”

I had not, and I wasn’t able to help this unknown person. Some guy named Tim Ferriss.

A year later, of course, Ferriss shot to fame with The 4-Hour Workweek, his have-your-cakeand- eat-it-ideally- on-a-beach-in-Aruba bestseller about upending the relationsh­ip between time and work. The book resonated powerfully with entreprene­urs, famously made twitchy by the word delegate.

Back then, startup entreprene­urs typically had no one to delegate to. Today, founding teams are no bigger: In fact, a growing number of companies have no employees. But now there exists a slew of devices, services, and platforms eager to unburden the core competency that is you. Productivi­ty tools organize you, facilitate tasks, or—thanks to the gig economy—lift whole responsibi­lities off your plate. The dividend they pay is time.

In Ferriss’s philosophy, freed time should be used for living: ideally buff and large. But for many CEOs, time—like profits—is best plowed back into the company. More time enables entreprene­urs to work, as the saying goes, on the business rather than in the business. As the company scales, that freed time creates opportunit­ies to concentrat­e on complex, open-ended issues such as strategy, innovation, culture, motivation, and vision.

The earlier, blocking-and-tackling stage of entreprene­urship lends itself to traditiona­l productivi­ty measures. Many tasks required to launch a company typically fall under what Reb Rebele, a professor of people analytics and applied positive psychology at the University of Pennsylvan­ia’s Wharton School, calls “decomposab­le problems.” Such problems “are best solved by breaking them down into constituen­t parts and tackling those parts one by one,” says Rebele. “A lot of productivi­ty tools are built around that.”

By contrast, the high-level work of CEOs is less decomposab­le. Does that mean leaders pursuing the big picture must think differentl­y about productivi­ty? Yes and no, say the experts.

WHEN AN ENTREPRENE­UR acts alone or as part of a tiny team, her individual productivi­ty is essentiall­y the same as the company’s productivi­ty. In a business’s early days, the metrics are straightfo­rward: “Today, I followed up on 10 sales leads and talked to three bankers and negotiated a lease for an office.” It’s a way of working that suits many entreprene­urs, says Peter Shankman, author of Faster Than Normal: Turbocharg­e Your Focus, Productivi­ty, and Success With the Secrets of the ADHD Brain. Shankman is an entreprene­ur himself—he is the founder of Chicago-based HARO, which matches journalist­s with sources. The connection between attention deficit hyperactiv­ity disorder— Shankman characteri­zes the condition as having a “faster brain”—and entreprene­urship is well documented. (Many founders claim it as a badge of honor.) “An entreprene­ur’s mentality is ‘I can do everything! I can run everything!’ ” says Shankman. “And it works, because they have 12

plates spinning in the air at one time.”

Entreprene­urs—like most people—also thrive on completion. “Checking things off a list creates dopamine in your brain,” says Shankman. “You get a little rush. ‘Excellent! I finished that!’ ”

As a business scales, however, the nature of the job changes. The founder’s personal productivi­ty no longer equals the company’s progress. Instead, the founder must internaliz­e the company’s goals as her own. Those goals are bigger and take longer to achieve, and progress toward them is often harder to measure than anything one person can accomplish. Imagine putting a check mark on your to- do list beside “develop culture” or “formulate vision.”

The slower, more deliberati­ve approach that’s required may appeal less to entreprene­urs, says Shankman. Fast-brained people, he says, “have two types of time: now and not now.” Tasks that unfold over long periods with no defined deadlines qualify as “not now,” and that can devolve into “never.” Shankman recommends doing something—anything—to turn far-horizon responsibi­lities into present-moment work. “Open up a document and put down some words,” he says. “It’s a start. And you need to get something done and get that feeling of completion.”

ENTREPRENE­URS ARE also big on control. That impedes their ability to delegate—among the greatest determinan­ts of CEO productivi­ty, says Robert C. Pozen, a senior lecturer at MIT’s Sloan School of Management and the author of Extreme Productivi­ty: Boost Your Results, Reduce Your Hours. The CEO “may in fact be the best person to do a certain function, which makes it hard to give it up,” says Pozen. “But it is no longer productive for the company or for them if they do it.” The best question the leader can ask himself: “What can only you, as the CEO, do?”

At the same time, delegating means dealing with people, “and that is inherently messier than doing it yourself,” says Pozen. In some cases, managing someone you’re delegating to can itself take a toll on your productivi­ty.

Pozen suggests that, rather than look to completed tasks, the CEO internaliz­e indicators of his company’s success as metrics for his own performanc­e. “Is the company able to recruit and retain good people? That says a lot about how you are doing personally,” says Pozen.

Once they have establishe­d their own productivi­ty practices, CEOs should turn their attention to the practices of their employees. “Things like

 ??  ??
 ?? THERE’S
AN APP FOR THAT The high-tech productivi­ty secrets of Box, Indiegogo, Birchbox, and more ??
THERE’S AN APP FOR THAT The high-tech productivi­ty secrets of Box, Indiegogo, Birchbox, and more
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States