Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

City pays $800K in wrongful death suit

Firefighte­rs responded to 911 call but refused to treat a man inside facility, citing pandemic protocols

- By Joe Nelson jnelson@scng.com

The city of Rialto has settled for $800,000 a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the daughter of a man who died after suffering cardiac arrest at a post acute care center that firefighte­rs refused to enter due to alleged coronaviru­s protocols.

Rialto Fire Capt. Josh Gilliam, firefighte­r-paramedic Matt Payne, and fire engineer Mark Brady said they were abiding by state COVID-19 guidelines when they ignored pleas from staff to enter Rialto Post Acute Care just before 8 p.m. on Nov. 17, 2021, while responding to a 911 call.

Joseph Angulo, 56, had been recovering at the center from injuries he suffered in a traffic collision when nursing staff found him unresponsi­ve in his room and called 911. As the three firefighte­rs stood outside the entrance, nursing staff inside the facility, assisted by Rialto police Sgt. Ralph Ballew, scrambled to push Angulo’s bed outside as a nurse sat atop Angulo performing chest compressio­ns. The pandemoniu­m was captured on Ballew’s body-worn camera.

Once outside, Angulo was taken to Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, where he died.

Rialto Post Acute Care Center is a 170-bed, licensed skilled nursing facility that provides posthospit­al care to patients requiring rehabilita­tion or who are unable to care for themselves. The center, however, lacks advanced life-support capabiliti­es, requiring paramedics to perform such functions.

Angulo’s daughter, Bridgette Angulo, filed a $100 million wrongful death claim against the city in March 2022, followed by a lawsuit in August 2022. The city approved the settlement during a closed-session meeting on March 12, and Angulo signed the agreement onwednesda­y, City Councilman Ed Scott said Monday.

Angulo’s attorney, William Shapiro, could not

immediatel­y be reached for comment.

“We continue to mourn the patient’s death and our prayers are with the patient’s family in hopes that we may all heal through settlement of this unfortunat­e matter,” Rialto Mayor Deborah Robertson said in a statement Monday.

Gilliam and Payne were fired and Brady suspended following the incident. Their actions were detailed in a blistering 487-page report released by the city in November 2022.

While the firefighte­rs maintained they were strictly adhering to COVID-19 protocols, Rialto Fire Chief Brian Park said at the time that local or state emergency medical service providers, including Rialto’s, were never prohibited from entering skilled nursing facilities to provide care, especially for high-acuity patients or facilities needing assistance.

Additional­ly, Park said that due to widespread vaccinatio­n and improved knowledge, many Covidrelat­ed mandates had been lifted by November 2021.

The three firefighte­rs appealed their terminatio­ns and suspension, and on Jan. 31 arbitrator Kenneth A. Perea reversed the city’s decisions, concluding that while a “prepondera­nce of the evidence” supported a finding that the three were liable for misconduct, their punishment was unreasonab­le.

Perea ordered that Gilliam and Payne be reinstated to their positions with full seniority restored and that they receive back pay. He also ordered that Gilliam and Payne’s discipline be modified to a oneweek suspension without pay, according to the 28page ruling.

As for Brady, Perea ordered that his suspension be revoked and expunged “from all files and records” and that he receive back pay for the 10 work shifts he missed.

Perea said in his ruling that the three firefighte­rs had responded to two other calls at Rialto Post Acute Care that evening, and apparently entered the facility, but they had grown frustrated by the time they received the third call regarding Angulo.

Gilliam, according to Perea’s ruling, was working overtime that night and assigned to Payne’s and Brady’s crew, which was from another station.

At 6:12 p.m., Gilliam’s crew was dispatched to the center regarding a patient complainin­g of shortness of breath. The patient, however, declined to be taken to the hospital. At 7:24 p.m., Gilliam’s crew was called back to the center, this time regarding an 81-yearold patient experienci­ng abdominal pain. However, Gilliam’s crew, not the ambulance crew, transporte­d the patient to Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, according to Perea’s ruling.

About 20 minutes later, Gilliam returned and, according to Perea’s ruling, “re-entered” the center, asking the nursing supervisor “why are we being called on these inter-facility transfers?” The nursing supervisor told Gilliam that the ambulance service, American Medical Response, did not respond to “code 2” calls for service, which are urgent but noncritica­l calls and do not require lights or sirens to be on.

Attorney Jason A. Ewert, who represente­d the firefighte­rs during the arbitratio­n, could not immediatel­y be reached for comment Monday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States