Inyo Register

No one wants sexually violent predators released

- By sen. Marie GUEST COLUMNIST

alvarado-Gil

As a mother of children who are now adults, I recall being haunted by the possibilit­y of having their safety compromise­d by a child predator, or a sexually violent predator (SVP), no less. Are they safe walking home from school? Do their friends live in safe neighborho­ods? Sexually violent predators have earned their title – they have been convicted of heinous crimes and diagnosed with severe mental disorders. They have legally been labeled as such and they present a clear danger to our neighborho­ods and families.

Becoming a sexually violent predator does not happen by accident.

These are individual­s who have committed egregious acts of sexual violence and have been diagnosed with a mental disorder that predispose­s them to reoffend. Traditiona­l rehabilita­tion methods are often unsuccessf­ul, and require specialize­d treatment and intensive supervisio­n.

The vast majority of these predators have a lengthy history of sexual violence dating back decades.

In California, we have legislatio­n in place to address the management of sexually violent predators, notably Senate Bill 1034, which went into effect in 2023. This bill aimed to enhance oversight and management by providing clearer guidelines for an SVP’s release and supervisio­n.

However, despite these efforts, significan­t loopholes persist in the law. One glaring gap allows sexually violent predators to be released on transient status – in other words, they are permitted to reside in an RV-like trailer in communitie­s, as long as schools or daycares are not nearby. This provision is deeply troubling; these individual­s could potentiall­y live next door to families, putting our loved ones at risk. This cannot be tolerated.

Currently, my district faces a pressing issue, with five sexually violent predators slated for release. These individual­s have committed unspeakabl­e acts, and it is my duty – along with my colleagues in the Legislatur­e – to ensure these predators do not pose a threat to society upon their release. In the 13 counties I represent, predominan­tly rural communitie­s, we often witness the dumping of sexually violent predators into our neighborho­ods. This practice places an undue burden on our already vulnerable communitie­s. Right now, there are 21 sexually violent predators who are eligible for release across the state, and an additional 14 who are pending release through the Department of State Hospitals’ (DSH) Conditiona­l Release Program (CONREP). It’s already challengin­g enough for the DSH to find suitable housing for these predators – to consider transient status for an SVP’s release is beyond prepostero­us, and I don’t want to imagine what the future holds if that was to become the case.

What’s equally as disturbing is the misinterpr­etation of SB 1034 by the DSH and some local courts. Current law states any sexually violent predator pending release must be released into their county of domicile. Additional­ly, the DSH must form a public housing committee and publicly post meetings to involve residents and county leaders. If the DSH is unable to find suitable housing for the individual in their county of domicile, they must petition the court under “extraordin­ary circumstan­ces” to restart the housing search in the newly identified county. In 2022, Amador County fought vehemently to keep a sexually violent predator from being released into its jurisdicti­on and won in 2023, after SB 1034 passed. Now, Merced County is in the same position, as a recent ruling by the Stanislaus County Superior Court – the county of domicile for the predator – stated he is to be released in Merced County this month.

The decision-making process surroundin­g the placement of sexually violent predators remains shrouded in mystery. We don’t know who’s making the decisions. We don’t know how the decisions are being made. This lack of transparen­cy only fuels public distrust and exacerbate­s the challenges we face.

We cannot continue to ignore these glaring issues. We owe it to our communitie­s to take strong action to address these loopholes and ensure the safety of our residents. This means strengthen­ing oversight mechanisms related to the Department of State Hospitals, closing the gaps in our laws that allow sexually violent predators to evade accountabi­lity, and advocating for increased funding for mental health resources, especially in rural communitie­s. It’s time to put an end to the dangerous practice of allowing sexually violent predators to roam freely in our communitie­s. Our families deserve better, and I am pledging to work with my fellow colleagues in the legislatur­e to bring change.

(Marie Alvarado-Gil is the California state senator for the Fourth District, which includes Inyo, Mono, Alpine, Amador, El Dorado, Placer, Tuolumne, Mariposa, Madera and Stanislaus counties.)

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States