Journal-Advocate (Sterling)

Longshot effort to disqualify Trump unanimousl­y rejected

The Hail Mary attempts to keep Donald Trump off the ballot this November weren’t in vain. They managed to unify the U.S. Supreme Court.

-

On Monday, the justices ruled 9-0 that states don’t have the authority to remove a federal candidate from the ballot under the 14th Amendment’s “insurrecti­on” clause. Only Congress can enforce such a provision.

While the court was narrowly split on the scope of the ruling, all nine justices agreed with the core principle that the state of Colorado went too far in banning Trump from the state’s presidenti­al slate. The Constituti­on grants states no such power, the justices held, and a system that allowed states to unilateral­ly make such decisions would potentiall­y trigger electoral chaos.

“The result could well be that a single candidate would be declared ineligible in some states, but not others, based on the same conduct (and perhaps even the same factual record),” the opinion declared. “The ‘patchwork’ that would likely result from state enforcemen­t would ‘sever the direct link that the Framers found so critical between the national government and the people of the United States’ as a whole.”

While 9-0 decisions are not rare at the high court — from 2008-2019, at least 35 percent of all cases each year were decided without dissent, according to Politifact — the unanimity reflects how far leftist activists overreache­d in attempting to keep the former president out of the White House. The agreement on the nation’s highest court also makes it more difficult for progressiv­e critics — who seem to believe the judicial branch exists to rubber-stamp their constituti­onally dubious whims — to attack the legal reasoning behind the decision.

It’s worth rememberin­g, as a Colorado Supreme Court justice noted while dissenting in the state ruling that upheld Trump’s removal, that the Colorado secretary of state acted without any “procedural due process” at all. The case “lacked basic discovery, the ability to subpoena documents and compel witnesses, workable time frames to adequately investigat­e and develop defenses, and the opportunit­y for a fair trial — to adjudicate a federal constituti­onal claim.”

If Democrats believe Trump is a threat to the republic, they’ll now have to beat him the democratic way: by taking their case to the American people and picking up enough states to carry the Electoral College in November.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States