Kitsap Sun

Cascadia bullet train left out of federal rail funding

- Tom Banse

The Federal Railroad Administra­tion largely passed over the Pacific Northwest while doling out more than $8 billion on Friday to improve passenger rail service across the nation.

Advocates who envision a 250 mph bullet train zipping between Portland, Oregon and Vancouver, Canada, were looking forward to celebratin­g a nearly $200 million grant award. Instead, the Washington and Oregon transporta­tion department­s came away with a couple of rail developmen­t grants of $500,000.

Boosters of the “ultra-high speed” passenger train insisted the dream of one-hour trips from Vancouver to Seattle or Seattle to Portland is still positioned to get federal support down the line and that one of the smaller grants was a positive sign. Skeptics of the costly project breathed a sigh of relief and urged a refocused effort to upgrade existing Amtrak Cascades service between Vancouver and Eugene, Oregon.

“They didn’t ignore us, which is a good thing,” Washington State House Transporta­tion Committee Vice Chair Brandy Donaghy (D-Snohomish County) said. “We can keep going, and that’s the important part.”

A contrastin­g and pithy reaction to the federal rejection came from a rail advocate who takes a dim view of what he calls the “bullet train boondoggle.”

“Thank god,” wrote Vashon Island’s Bill Moyer in an email.

The missed high-speed rail grant from the federal government would have paid for conceptual engineerin­g, environmen­tal analysis and business case developmen­t to pin down important, unresolved details for a Cascadia bullet train such as the best routes, timeline, financing, and number of stops. The $198 million

requested would not have been enough to start track constructi­on, tunneling or even right-of-way acquisitio­n.

To operate at the planned top speed, the proposed electrifie­d bullet train would need its own dedicated track. Eyeballing of possible routes during previous studies projected extensive tunneling and new bridges would be required to achieve the desired speedy trip times.

The current top speed of Amtrak trains in the Pacific Northwest is 79 mph. Those passenger trains are routinely delayed by congestion on a mainline shared with freight trains. BNSF and Union Pacific own the tracks used by passenger trains in the region.

Earlier this year, a consultant on contract to the Washington Legislatur­e’s Joint Transporta­tion Committee estimated constructi­on of a “state of the art” Cascadia high-speed rail link (similar to 200-plus mph systems in Europe and Asia) could cost anywhere between $36 billion and $150 billion dollars.

For a reality check, Oregon and Washington have spent a decade trying to raise a comparativ­ely paltry $6 billion in financing for a new Interstate 5 bridge over the Columbia River and are currently only a little over halfway to the goal.

Doubters are many and it’s not helping that California’s high-speed rail project to connect the San Francisco Bay metro area with Los Angeles is way behind schedule and has incurred huge cost overruns.

However, the Biden administra­tion stood behind the California High-Speed Rail Authority by giving it the single largest grant in this award cycle: $3.07 billion to further constructi­on on the 171mile initial operating segment in the Central Valley.

The second biggest award was $3 billion to launch constructi­on on the privately operated Brightline West highspeed intercity rail line between suburban Los Angeles and Las Vegas. In addition, the Federal Railroad Administra­tion selected eight bridge, track and station replacemen­t projects for more modest support out of a total of 67 grant applicatio­ns. All of those chosen were “shovel-ready” constructi­on projects, as opposed to a big-ticket planning grant as Washington state requested.

Washington and Oregon were among 44 states that got $500,000 Corridor Identifica­tion and Developmen­t grants. Washington Transporta­tion Secretary Roger Millar said one of those awarded grants would pay to create a blueprint for improvemen­ts to the Amtrak Cascades service over the next 20 years. The second grant the Northwest states got will support planning and viability assessment of the separate rail corridor for the proposed Cascadia bullet train, including a potential future extension to Eugene.

State Sen. Marko Liias (D-Edmonds), chair of the Washington Senate Transporta­tion Committee, echoed WSDOT agency leaders who said in a press release they are pleased because the two modest grant awards mean both programs in the Northwest are designated as national rail corridors and, the release said, “are now part of the federal funding pipeline for future intercity passenger rail projects.”

“Corridor selections announced today create a strong pipeline of projects that will drive future passenger rail expansion in America,” amplified FRA Administra­tor Amit Bose in a prepared statement. “The Federal Railroad Administra­tion is particular­ly excited about the potential of the Cascadia High-Speed Rail Corridor.”

Push for Amtrak improvemen­ts instead

Some passenger rail advocates have voiced misgivings about throwing money and energy at the Cascadia bullet train while the existing Amtrak Cascades

line struggles with reliabilit­y and capacity. In September, 15 transit user and climate action groups led by the small nonprofit Solutionar­y Rail cosigned a letter to Transporta­tion Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Administra­tor Bose urging them to reject the grant applicatio­n for Cascadia high-speed rail planning.

“We don’t need the ‘Ultra’ high speed boondoggle project. We need the feds to support implementa­tion of the common sense and feasible long range plan for the Amtrak Cascades that delivers Acelalike higher speed rail to our region,” said Moyer, who authored the book “Solutionar­y Rail” about electrifyi­ng railroads.

Moyer and like-minded rail advocates want Washington and Oregon to prioritize ramping up service on the state-supported Amtrak Cascades line to 110 mph with hourly departures throughout the daytime and evenings. That would require straighten­ing some slow-speed curves and building more triple-track segments along the BNSF mainline for passenger trains to overtake slower freight trains.

The group letter to the U.S. Department of Transporta­tion argued that investing in Amtrak Cascades would bring mobility and climate benefits to the region much sooner and more cheaply than a bullet train decades in the future could.

“We support both. They’re both important,” responded Ron Pate, Cascadia High-Speed Rail and I-5 Program Administra­tor at WSDOT. “They work together to get the best value out of the system.”

Covetous eyes cast on $150 million state set-aside

In 2022, Washington state legislator­s pledged $150 million to attract a much larger sum of federal matching dollars for the Cascadia bullet train project. Now as it turns out the federal spigot isn’t opening – at least, not anytime soon – rail advocates and others want to get their hands on that money.

Liias said part of the $50 million set aside in the current budget will still be needed for corridor planning. What’s left over could be spent on other projects such as to improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrian­s. He expressed confidence the Legislatur­e will secure any money needed to match a future grant.

Moyer suggested the $150 million be redirected to Amtrak Cascades improvemen­t projects, such as straighten­ing a sharp curve over Interstate 5 near DuPont, Washington, where a deadly derailment happened in 2017.

Passenger rail advocates such as the group All Aboard Northwest are also holding out for better east-west service. A proposed state-supported SeattleYak­ima Valley-Pasco-Spokane passenger line was critiqued in a consultant study from a few years ago as unlikely to attract enough ridership to justify the heavy investment needed to upgrade the existing slow-speed freight tracks.

Separately, the mayors of Boise and Salt Lake City spearheade­d an applicatio­n this past spring for federal money to launch a feasibilit­y study of restoring the old Amtrak Pioneer route. Until the line was canceled due to declining ridership in 1997, Pioneer trains ran between Salt Lake City and Seattle via Pocatello, Boise, Pendleton, the Columbia River Gorge and Portland.

But on Friday, the Federal Railroad Administra­tion passed over the Amtrak Pioneer study funding request.

Another discontinu­ed route of regional interest, the old North Coast Hiawatha, did get a lifeline for possible revival. That alternativ­e routing through Montana of the long-distance Empire Builder train got $500,000, similar to the Amtrak Cascades developmen­t grant. The North Coast Hiawatha route swings through Billings, Bozeman, Butte and Missoula, which the current Empire Builder bypasses on its northerly crossing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States