La Semana

Microcepha­ly Revives Battle for Legal Abortion in Brazil

-

The Zika virus epidemic and a rise in the number of cases of microcepha­ly in newborns have revived the debate on legalising abortion in Brazil. However, the timing is difficult as conservati­ve and religious groups are growing in strength, especially in parliament.

“We are issuing a call to society to hold a rational, generous debate towards a review of the law that criminalis­es abortion,” lawyer Silvia Pimentel told IPS.

Pimentel, one of the 23 independen­t experts who oversee compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Eliminatio­n of all Forms of Discrimina­tion Against Women (CEDAW), defends the right to abortion in cases of “severe and irreversib­le birth defects”.

In Brazil, a 1940 law makes abortion illegal with two exceptions: when it is necessary to save the mother’s life or if the pregnancy is the result of rape.

A third exception, in cases of anencephal­ic fetuses -which have no brain – was legalised in 2012 as the result of a Supreme Court ruling based on the fact that they cannot survive outside the womb.

“This is different – microcepha­ly is not like anencephal­y, in terms of surviving outside the womb; for the anencephal­ic fetus, the uterus serves as an intensive care unit; many even die before they are born,” said Clair Castilhos, executive secretary of the National Feminist Network for Health and Sexual and Reproducti­ve Rights.

Microcepha­lic children, who are born with abnormally small heads, often have some degree of mental retardatio­n, but they can survive.

If the Supreme Court rules in favour of the right to abortion in cases of microcepha­ly, as women’s rights activists are seeking, “it would be a fourth exception,” she said.

“Although it wouldn’t be what we’re working for, which is the right for all women to decide whether to continue with a pregnancy, in any circumstan­ces, rather than have an abortion as a ‘permissibl­e crime’ in some cases,” she said in an interview with IPS.

But the approval of this “fourth exception” is unlikely.

Those opposed to making abortion legal, led by religious groups, argue that it violates the most basic of human rights, the right to life. They even protested the decriminal­isation of abortion in cases of anencephal­ic fetuses, arguing that life begins at conception.

In their campaign over the social networks, they are now arguing that abortion of microcepha­lic fetuses amounts to “eugenics” or selective breeding, and compare those who defend the right to abortion in these cases to Nazis. (IPS)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States