Lake County Record-Bee

California and abortion pill

- Lake County Record-Bee

Gov. Newsom said he would listen to the U.S. Supreme Court arguments Tuesday about the availabili­ty of a widely used abortion pill — and then decide whether to replenish the state's stockpile.

But afterwards, his office said he is still considerin­g his options, reports CalMatters health reporter Kristen Hwang.

Brandon Richards, Newsom spokespers­on: “California remains ready to purchase up to another 1.75 million pills given the ongoing attacks to abortion care access happening across the country — not just at the Supreme Court.” Newsom also released a statement Tuesday,

warning that “Republican­s want a national abortion ban,” which should “scare the hell out of everyone.”

Attorney General Rob Bonta — who along with the governor filed an amicus brief supporting the drug, according to The Sacramento Bee — released his own statement ensuring abortion access to California­ns.

Bonta: “Upholding full access to mifepristo­ne isn't just about preserving access to a medication; it's about affirming the fundamenta­l right of every individual to autonomy over their own body and reproducti­ve healthcare decisions.” The high court heard oral arguments in a case brought by a Christian legal group that wants to limit the availabili­ty of mifepristo­ne and is challengin­g the U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion's 24-year approval of the drug. The pill is recommende­d to be used alongside another medication, misoprosto­l, to induce abortions.

Last year, a federal district court in Texas suspended federal approval of the drug, but days later, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals partially overruled the ruling.

Because of the drug's tenuous legal status, however, California began to stockpile misoprosto­l. It has since distribute­d nearly all its inventory of the medication, reports the San Francisco Chronicle, having purchased 250,000 pills from ANI Pharmaceut­icals for about $107,000.

Supreme Court justices, both liberals and some conservati­ves, appear to be “deeply skeptical” about arguments to restrict access to the pills nationwide, according to The New York Times. The court is expected to rule in June.

—Lynn La, CALMatters

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States