Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

‘Miracle on the Hudson’ safety advice unused

FAA officials rejected several suggestion­s

- By JOAN LOWY

WASHINGTON — In the seven years since an airline captain saved 155 lives by ditching his crippled airliner in the Hudson River, there has been enough time to write a book and make a movie but apparently not enough to carry out most of the safety recommenda­tions stemming from the accident.

Of the 35 recommenda­tions made by the National Transporta­tion Safety Board in response to the incident involving US Airways Flight 1549, only six have been heeded, according to an Associated Press review of board records.

The movie “Sully,” which opened in theaters last week is based in part on an autobiogra­phy by veteran pilot Chesley “Sully” Sullenberg­er, played by Tom Hanks. It celebrates how Sullenberg­er, with his co-pilot, flight attendants, air traffic controller­s, ferry boat operators and first responders, did their jobs with profession­alism and competence, averting a tragedy. The plane lost thrust in both engines after colliding with a flock of Canada geese shortly after takeoff from LaGuardia Airport in New York. No one died, and only five people were seriously injured.

“The FAA was very upset back then that we made any recommenda­tions at all,” recalled Tom Haueter, who was the NTSB’s head of aviation safety at the time. “They thought this was a success story.”

But to investigat­ors, the event turned up problems. “This could happen again, and we want to make sure that if it does, there are some better safety measures in place,” Haueter said.

Fourteen of the recommenda­tions issued to the Federal Aviation Administra­tion and its European counterpar­t, EASA, are marked by the NTSB as “closed-unacceptab­le,” which means that regulators rejected the advice. One has been withdrawn, and the rest remain unresolved.

The untold story of the “Miracle on the Hudson” was the part luck played in preventing catastroph­e on that freezing afternoon in January 2009. The wind chill was 2 degrees, and the water temperatur­e was 41 degrees, raising the risk of “cold shock,” a condition in which people lose the use of their arms and legs, usually drowning within 5 minutes.

It was sheer chance that the plane, an Airbus A320, was equipped with rafts, life vests and seat cushions that can be used for flotation. The equipment is only required on “extended overwater” flights, and not on Flight 1549’s New York to Charlotte, North Carolina, route.

The NTSB recommende­d requiring life vests and flotation cushions on all planes, regardless of the route. But the FAA responded that it was leaving that up to the airlines.

The board also recommende­d that vest storage be redesigned for easier retrieval. The NTSB’s investigat­ion found that only 10 passengers retrieved life vests and not all of them put them on correctly. Despite some changes by the FAA, the board reports it still takes more than a few seconds to retrieve vests, which is as much time as passengers are willing to take when exiting a plane filling with water.

Because Flight 1549’s descent was faster than the plane is designed to handle for a ditching, the underside of the aircraft was damaged when it hit the water. The two rear rafts were submerged and unusable. That left only the two forward rafts, which are designed to hold a maximum of 110 people — well short of the 155 on board. Many of the passengers wound up standing on the wings as the plane sank into the river.

The NTSB recommende­d changing the location of the rafts to ensure capacity for all passengers, as it’s unlikely the rear rafts would be available. The FAA rejected that, saying that if Sullenberg­er had followed Airbus’ directions on descent speeds for ditching, the rear rafts would have been usable. The NTSB said the ability of pilots to achieve those descent speeds has never been tested and can’t be relied on.

Some passengers wound up using the inflated exit ramps as rafts though they’re not designed for that. But passengers weren’t able to release the ramps from the plane, running the risk that the ramps would be pulled underwater along with it.

The NTSB recommende­d requiring quick-release attachment­s for ramps. The FAA rejected the advice, saying its analysis shows that the attachment­s were likely to be fully or partially underwater. NTSB said its investigat­ion showed that wasn’t the case.

In the movie, immediatel­y after Flight 1549’s engines quit, first officer Jeff Skiles, played by Aaron Eckhart, began going through a checklist of procedures for restarting the engines. Pilots are trained to do that in an emergency when they don’t know how to fix a problem, but Skiles was only able to get through a fraction of the checklist items before the plane landed in the river.

The NTSB’s investigat­ion showed the procedures were designed for a dual-engine failure at a cruising altitude above 20,000 feet, high enough for pilots to complete the list while descending and still have time to regain altitude. But Flight 1549 collided with the geese at an altitude of only 2,818 feet. Among NTSB’s closed-unacceptab­le recommenda­tions are that the FAA require airlines to include procedures for a low-altitude, dual-engine failure in checklists and pilot training.

 ?? BEBETO MATTHEWS THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ??
BEBETO MATTHEWS THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States