Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Officials apologize for mistaken cremation

Same names at morgue identified as cause

- By RICHARD WINTON

LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles County coroner’s office mistakenly cremated a 26-year-old man after confusing his remains with those of another man with the same name, authoritie­s said Friday.

Coroner’s officials said the mistake occurred because a technician failed to check the case number on the man’s body, and they apologized to the family.

Jorge Hernandez died of a drug overdose Oct. 7 after being taken to Glendale Adventist Medical Center. His body was picked up by the coroner’s office to determine a cause. The family began planning a funeral and private viewing for Hernandez until coroner’s officials called them to say they mistakenly cremated his body.

Armand Montiel, a coroner’s office spokesman, said the mistake happened because two men named Jorge Hernandez were at the morgue. The other Hernandez was indigent and was scheduled to be cremated.

“When retrieving the remains the coroner’s attendant matched the name but did not match the coroner case number. It was an oversight by human error,” Montiel said. The attendant sent the wrong remains for cremation, he said.

“The department is profoundly sorry for any additional discomfort that this has caused the loved ones of Mr. Hernandez,” Montiel said. The chief medical examiner delivered a personal apology to the family, he said.

Family members stunned by the mistake.

“Sorry doesn’t bring him back. This was really upsetting,” said Mary Lou Diaz of her nephew’s cremation. “I know they have bodies stacking up but there needs to be accountabi­lity here.

“We thought, ‘No, this isn’t happening. They have to be wrong,’” she said. “It was devastatin­g. There was no goodbye. There was no closure. The whole family has been affected by this double tragedy.”

The incident occurred as the coroner’s office is trying to reduce a backlog in cases caused by staffing shortages. The backlog has sparked complaints from families and law enforcemen­t officials.

Luis Carrillo, an attorney for Hernandez’s family, said a lawsuit is being planned.

“The coroner’s office is chronicall­y understaff­ed and underfunde­d, so errors get made and this has a very real impact on their survivors,” he said.

“There was apparently no supervisor double-checking on the bodies before cremation.”

Carrillo said Hernandez’s mother, Mirna Amaya, was particular­ly hit hard by the mistake. “She wanted remained photos of his peacefully resting in his coffin,” Carrillo said. “She is so distraught she had to seek medical treatment.”

Coroner’s records show Hernandez’s death was an accidental drug overdose.

The coroner’s office’s accreditat­ion with the National Associatio­n of Medical Examiners was scheduled to expire Aug. 24 but remains active pending the results and report of an inspection Oct. 17.

To keep its full, five-year accreditat­ion, the office must be completed within 90 days in 90 percent of cases.

But an office with some shortcomin­gs can receive provisiona­l accreditat­ion for a year. Such accreditat­ion is not legally required but provides a guarantee of quality and bolster its credibilit­y in court.

Officials have blamed staffing and budget shortages, broken equipment and the difficulty in recruiting and training highly skilled employees for backlogs on autopsies and testing.

County supervisor­s have boosted funding and is in the process of hiring 22 additional employees.

But as of Sept. 21, toxicology and other tests had not been completed on more than 1,500 bodies — an improvemen­t over June, when the figure was 2,100.

In 2015, the L.A. coroner’s office completed 81 percent of its cases within the 90-day window; the rate dropped to 78 percent between June 2015 and June 2016.

As of last month, nearly 1,500 cases remain incomplete after 90 days, including roughly 570 that have lingered for more than 150 days.

Montiel said the coroner’s office has a policy requiring staffers to check the name and the coroner’s case number to make sure there are no misidentif­ications. He said this system has generally worked.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States