Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Sports coups a boost but stir taxing issues

- RICHARD N. VELOTTA INSIDE TOURISM

LAST week’s Las Vegas stadium groundbrea­king event reminded representa­tives of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority about the impact of something few of us saw coming: Southern Nevada’s sudden emergence as a center for profession­al sports.

We’re strutting our major-league swagger as a result of the phenomenon: the surprising early success of the Vegas Golden Knights; that feeling of reality that we will have the NFL and the Las Vegas Raiders here by 2020; new NASCAR races at the expanding Las Vegas Motor Speedway; MGM Resorts Internatio­nal’s surprising acquisitio­n of the WNBA San Antonio Stars, widely viewed as an investment toward a larger prize, an NBA franchise for Las Vegas.

Even minor-league moves have made headlines with a new ballpark for the Las Vegas 51s and the naming of the city’s new minor-league soccer franchise and the introducti­on of a coach for the Las Vegas Lights.

The rapid emergence of sports ramps up our civic pride but also unleashes a new set of issues, and the LVCVA will soon find itself right in the middle of them.

The most immediate concern is the same one the Las Vegas Stadium Authority is keeping its eye on: Congress’ handling of tax reform legislatio­n and how tax-exempt bonds used to pay for venues used by profession­al sports teams are affected.

LVCVA Chief Financial Officer Rana Lacer said she’s keeping a close watch on the matter because she believes a strict interpreta­tion of the law could mean that the LVCVA would be banned from using tax-exempt bonds on some capital expenses, making projects more expensive to finance.

Lacer pointed out that some convention halls are used for profession­al sports exhibition­s, most notably profession­al bowling, which, on several occasions, used Cashman Center for national competitio­ns. While some believe such an interpreta­tion is a stretch, Lacer said the LVCVA doesn’t want to take any chances when millions of dollars are at stake.

There’s no doubt that the LVCVA markets profession­al sports as part of its bid to bring people to Las Vegas, and it is bound to do more in the future with all the new things coming to town.

The LVCVA has a major role in sponsoring the National Finals Rodeo, which has transforme­d the so-so tourism month of December into something significan­t. It was the ramrod behind bringing a second NASCAR race to Las Vegas, starting next September.

It sees big opportunit­ies to put heads in beds with fans of visiting teams attending Golden Knights games and, soon, Raiders games.

But the emphasis on sports has also angered and energized some people. The LVCVA’s sponsorshi­p with the Las Vegas 51s, which is helping build the new Las Vegas Ballpark in Summerlin, was met with heavy criticism with an $80 million investment to sponsor a team owned by the Howard Hughes Corp.

Critics are still howling about the $750 million public contributi­on to the Las Vegas stadium, which the LVCVA actually has little to do with. But that public contributi­on comes from revenue generated by a hotel room tax, the same mechanism that funds the LVCVA and its upcoming convention center expansion.

Next year, Lacer said the LVCVA might look at budgeting for a sports marketing reserve fund to finance bids for huge sporting events that will put thousands of heads in beds and bring millions of dollars to the community.

If a sports events reserve fund is establishe­d, it could be tapped to finance bids for events like the Super Bowl, the NCAA’s Final Four and the

many tournament­s within the FIFA soccer world, including the World Cup. That probably would be a partnershi­p with the Raiders and the Stadium Authority.

Questions no doubt will be asked whether it’s wise to devote resources to sports marketing. Even some members of the LVCVA board, specifical­ly Las Vegas Mayor Carolyn Goodman and Clark County Commission­er Lawrence Weekly, wondered aloud if it’s time to have another look at how room-tax funds are distribute­d and whether it’s time for a greater portion of those funds go to education programs.

It’s a debate for another day, but the policymake­rs are at least thinking about it.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States