Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Researcher­s say CCSD’s new sex misconduct video is improved, but still flawed.

District could’ve used more help, they say

- ▶ reviewjour­nal.com/brokentrus­t By Meghin Delaney

Clark County schools had a chance to lead the nation in training employees on appropriat­e relationsh­ips with students but instead issued flawed videos that fail to address a number of concerns, according to experts who reviewed the new recordings at the request of the Review-Journal.

The researcher­s, whom the district approached for advice last summer when it began work to upgrade its training program amid a spate of employee sexual misconduct cases, said the new videos are an improvemen­t.

But they say they could have been much better if officials had accepted

an offer to include the district in a new pilot training program at no cost. The district failed to seize the opportunit­y and subsequent­ly released new training videos that focus mainly on how employees should interact with students on social media, which they say is only part of the problem.

“They never took us up on the offer, they stopped returning calls, they sort of went in this other direction,” said Glenn Lipson, a researcher who consulted with the district and has created a training program called “Making Right Choices.”

Under a grant through Stop Educator Sexual Abuse Misconduct and Exploitati­on (SESAME) — one of the nation’s only nonprofits focused on preventing sexual misconduct in schools — Clark County employees would have undergone training with Lipson’s team. SESAME is based in Las Vegas and was founded by Terri Miller, a leading national advocate for laws and improved training to address the problem.

Afterward, the program would have been evaluated for effectiven­ess by Billie-Jo Grant, a senior researcher with Virginia-based Magnolia Consulting and a member of the SESAME board. Grant recently presented a Title IX report to the U.S. Department of Justice and is considered one of the pre-eminent researcher­s in the field.

Materials developed in-house

The “other direction” that the district took included developing a new social media policy for employees and issuing a new set of four videos aimed at educating students, parents and employees on appropriat­e relationsh­ips. CCSD sought feedback from the experts, but produced the videos in-house.

In an email, district officials didn’t dispute the experts’ account and said they appreciate­d the feedback, but did not directly address why they did not accept the grant.

“We are always open to discussing future opportunit­ies to improve our training,” spokeswoma­n Kirsten Searer said.

The district unveiled the new training videos in late January, saying they would erase any uncertaint­y about the limits of proper interactio­ns between employees and students.

“The vast majority of our employees are dedicated profession­als who care deeply for the safety of our students,” Superinten­dent Pat Skorkowsky said in a statement. “These videos will help our employees, coaches and volunteers set appropriat­e boundaries that protect them as well as students.”

The videos were reviewed by national experts at the request of the Review-Journal, which examined the sexual misconduct issue in a series last spring titled “Broken Trust.”

“I think it’s great they put something together,” said Grant, the school misconduct researcher. “We still need

to do more training for people on what it is, how it happens, how you can identify it and how to make a report. There’s multiple steps involved.”

Training videos

Until fall, the district had no policy on how employees should interact with students and relied on a vague, outdated nine-minute training video that included incorrect informatio­n on state laws.

Now, the district has four separate videos — one for parents, one for employees, one for all students and one for students in grades six and lower. It’s up to students and parents whether they watch the videos, which are posted online. All district employees are required to watch the training video on campus in a group viewing session by the end of March.

By tailoring the videos for different audiences and including voices of “stakeholde­rs” like parents, teachers and law enforcemen­t officials in the videos, the district addressed some concerns raised by the experts about its previous training materials. But the experts said the videos still have some fundamenta­l flaws.

One for students, for example, states that they shouldn’t have “romantic relationsh­ips” with employees, a phrase that Grant said should not be used.

“That’s not what these are. This is abuse and misconduct,” she said. “You shouldn’t use that terminolog­y, especially in a training video.”

The videos also don’t provide enough examples of “grooming behavior,” a term to describe actions adults use to lure minors into inappropri­ate relationsh­ips. Nor do they provide enough informatio­n on what actions to report and where to report them, the experts said.

Julie Brand, a retired Colorado counselor who lives in Henderson and studies female sex offenders, said the videos for students also fail to take into account how children learn.

“They need to slow it down, give examples,” said Brand, who works with SESAME. The video created for all students is about 90 seconds long, and mostly warns students about interactin­g with strangers online, telling them not to share personal informatio­n or meet someone in real life.

“We’re still doing stranger danger when in fact the majority of kids who are sexually abused or assaulted know their perpetrato­rs,” Brand said.

‘Consistent message’

At Foothill High School, in Henderson, the majority of staff, employees and volunteers watched the new video at a joint meeting with Principal Lisa Burkhead. Teachers also were provided with other resources to help identify and report child abuse.

“I think it’s important that a consistent message is sent across the entire district,” she said.

Some employees who couldn’t make the staff meeting watched the video later with a Review-Journal reporter present. Most said they found the informatio­n to be commonsens­e, but agreed that the message was more understand­able than the old video.

“I think it makes the policy a little more clear,” said Casandra Iglitz, the school’s special education instructio­n facilitato­r.

The policy, and the accompanyi­ng video for teachers, mostly focuses on the do’s and don’t’s of communicat­ing with students online, as well as warning that sexual relationsh­ips with students are prohibited by law.

For some teachers, complying with the new social media policy — which focuses on how and when they should message students on various platforms — won’t be an issue. But for those who also coach sports or advise clubs, it creates additional work.

Andrew Risheg, a site-based technician at Foothill, also coaches boys soccer and track and helps with the student council. He said he already tries to limit his one-on-one conversati­ons with students but will have to add another layer of reporting — sticking his head in the principal’s office to update her on all his conversati­ons, per the policy requiremen­ts.

“It’s a little bit too restrictiv­e,” he said of the new policy.

Wyatt Aping, a history teacher and the student council adviser, agreed. For his class assignment­s and communicat­ions, he uses a district-approved site called Remind to send text-based messages to students. But that site has a word-count cap and he said students often don’t turn notificati­ons on, making texting a better option.

“For advising, (student council) is an organizati­on where there’s stuff going on all the time,” he said, explaining the need for frequent messaging.

 ??  ??
 ?? Screen shot from the Clark County School District website ?? The Clark County School District unveiled new training videos in late January, saying they would erase any uncertaint­y about the limits of proper interactio­ns between employees and students.
Screen shot from the Clark County School District website The Clark County School District unveiled new training videos in late January, saying they would erase any uncertaint­y about the limits of proper interactio­ns between employees and students.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States