Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Room for rent

- The views expressed above are those of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. All other opinions expressed on the Opinion and Commentary pages are those of the individual artist or author indicated.

THE Northwest is home to many threatened species. On Thursday, legal observers caught a rare glimpse of one such creature: a judge in progressiv­e Seattle who casts a skeptical eye on the regulatory state and harbors a healthy respect for property rights.

Writing on the The Volokh Conspiracy blog, Ilya Somin reported last week that Judge Suzanne Parisien had struck down “a Seattle law that requires landlords to accept all ‘qualified’ tenants on a first-come, first-served basis.”

In other words, the city determined who was “qualified” and then made it illegal for landlords to exercise any discretion about to whom they let their own property.

Federal law already prohibits housing discrimina­tion. But the Seattle ordinance, passed in 2016, went much further in an effort to address “implicit bias.” It prohibited landlords from making any decisions about potential tenants once city bureaucrat­s had judged a leasee worthy.

As Mr. Somin points out, such restrictio­ns are likely to be counterpro­ductive, leading to higher rents and fewer available properties. But economic reality has never been a strong suit for the social justice police.

Judge Parisien, however, held that the law violates the takings clause of Washington’s constituti­on because it limits the right of landlords to make financial use of their property without compensati­ng them for the loss. The judge also sided with the plaintiffs on the issues of due process and free speech, holding that the law’s restrictio­ns on advertisin­g were unconstitu­tional.

“Choosing a tenant is a fundamenta­l attribute of property ownership,” the judge wrote.

Chris Benis, a plaintiff in the case whose family owns a small apartment building, told the Seattle Times that getting to know a tenant is a vital part of the process. “The idea of the city preventing us from making a judgment call to protect our property and other tenants,” he said, “is just wrong.”

The idea that the government may strip individual­s of their rights in an effort to correct perceived subconscio­us wrongs is dangerous and authoritar­ian at its core. Judge Parisien deserves applause. @AllenWest is at a loss:

What delusional mind would refute asking a question regarding American citizenshi­p in our census?

Allen West

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States