Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Taliban’s vow: No terrorism from Afghanista­n

Some say U.S. in rush to trust militant group

- By Deb Riechmann and Kathy Gannon

WASHINGTON — America’s longest war has come full circle.

The United States began bombing Afghanista­n after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, to root out al-Qaida fighters harbored by the Taliban.

Now, more than 18 years later, preventing Afghanista­n from being a launching pad for more attacks on America is at the heart of U.S. talks with the Taliban.

President Donald Trump’s envoy at the negotiatin­g table has said he is satisfied with the Taliban’s commitment to prevent internatio­nal terrorist organizati­ons from using Afghanista­n as a base to plot global attacks. There is even talk that a settlement might result in the Taliban joining the U.S. to fight Islamic State militants, rivals whose footprint is growing in mountainou­s northern Afghanista­n.

“The world needs to be sure that Afghanista­n will not be a threat to the internatio­nal community,” said the envoy, Zalmay Khalilzad, who was born in Afghanista­n and is a former U.S. ambassador to Afghanista­n. “We are satisfied with the commitment that we have received (from the Taliban) on counterter­rorism.”

Not everyone is convinced. Some Afghans worry that Trump’s desire to pull American troops from Afghanista­n will override doubts about the Taliban’s sincerity. Early in the talks, Hamdullah Mohib, national security adviser to Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, said counting on the Taliban to control other militants could be like “having cats guard the milk.”

Rep. Michael Waltz, who did multiple combat tours in Afghanista­n as a U.S. special forces officer, said he is happy to see the Taliban are negotiatin­g but does not see how Afghanista­n can keep from becoming a hotbed for terrorists wanting to strike the United States.

“I have my doubts about the Taliban’s sincerity No. 1,” said Waltz, R-Fla. “But even if you buy into that … how does the Taliban have the capability to enforce what a 300,000-man Afghan army, the U.S. forces and a coalition of armies around the world are continuing to struggle to do?”

Much is at stake.

The conflict in Afghanista­n has cost more than 2,300 American lives and hundreds of billions in taxpayer dollars. The Taliban control roughly half the country but not the cities. About 14,000 U.S. troops plus other NATO-led forces are still there. Intelligen­ce officials have warned that a withdrawal could return Afghanista­n to a time when the Taliban ruled a country that was an al-Qaida stronghold.

Despite nearly two decades of war, militant groups remain.

A U.N. Security Council report in April 2018 said al-Qaida was “closely allied with and embedded within the Taliban.” The report said the Taliban, which has no history of conducting attacks outside Afghanista­n, provide operating space for about 20 terrorist groups with thousands of fighters.

 ?? Alexander Zemlianich­enko The Associated Press file ?? Members of the Taliban delegation arrive for talks in May in Moscow. The Taliban has pledged to keep terror groups from using Afghanista­n as a launching pad.
Alexander Zemlianich­enko The Associated Press file Members of the Taliban delegation arrive for talks in May in Moscow. The Taliban has pledged to keep terror groups from using Afghanista­n as a launching pad.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States