Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Pregnancy discrimina­tion persists, 41 years on

Warren’s own story has brought complaints out

- By Dee-Ann Durbin

For 41 years, federal law has banned pregnancy discrimina­tion in the workplace. But the stories tumbling out this week show it’s far from eradicated.

Prompted by presidenti­al candidate Elizabeth Warren’s claim that she was forced out of a teaching job in 1971 because she was pregnant, scores of women have shared similar experience­s on social media. Police officers, academics, fast food workers, lawyers, flight attendants, administra­tive assistants and others say they hid pregnancie­s on the job or during interviews, faced demeaning comments and were demoted or fired after revealing a pregnancy.

When some raised doubts about Warren’s account — noting a 2007 interview in which she gave different reasons for leaving her job — women pushed back on Twitter and Facebook. Many say they accept Warren’s explanatio­n that she has grown more comfortabl­e since 2007 sharing the real reason she resigned from the school was because the principal hired someone else once Warren became visibly pregnant.

“Pregnancy discrimina­tion is real, and I believe Elizabeth Warren,” tweeted Dr. Diane Horvath, an obstetrici­an and gynecologi­st who works at Whole Woman’s Health, a clinic in Baltimore.

Horvath didn’t even trust her own profession when she was interviewi­ng for a family planning fellowship five years ago. She hid her pregnancy for 26 weeks during the applicatio­n process, buying multiple suits to hide her growing belly.

“It was just the worry that I was going to be seen as less reliable because I was a parent,” Horvath told The Associated Press. “There’s no good time to have a baby.”

Horvath noted that she was privileged. She knew she could fall back on her medical degree if she didn’t get the fellowship. But many women aren’t so lucky.

“The stakes are so much higher if people can’t get a job that will pay their rent and keep their kids from starving,” she said.

Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimina­tion by employers on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. In 1978, it was amended to forbid discrimina­tion based on pregnancy in any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay and job assignment­s in companies with 15 or more employees.

The law is still evolving; on Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to decide if it also bans discrimina­tion based on sexual orientatio­n and transgende­r status.

Pregnant women have other protection­s on the job. Impairment­s from pregnancy, such as gestationa­l diabetes, are considered disabiliti­es covered by the Americans with Disabiliti­es Act, and employers may have to offer accommodat­ions for them.

But complaints about harassment and other violations are common. There were 2,790 cases alleging pregnancy discrimina­tion filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunit­y Commission in 2018.

 ?? The Associated Press file ?? Democratic presidenti­al candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. has said she was forced out of a teaching position in 1971 because she was visibly pregnant.
The Associated Press file Democratic presidenti­al candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. has said she was forced out of a teaching position in 1971 because she was visibly pregnant.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States