Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

High court will consider White House rules on contracept­ives

- By Mark Sherman

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will consider allowing the Trump administra­tion to enforce rules that allow more employers to deny insurance coverage for contracept­ives.

The justices agreed Friday to yet another case stemming from President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul, this time about cost-free birth control. The court probably will hear arguments in April.

The high court will review an appeals court ruling that blocked the Trump administra­tion rules because it did not follow proper procedures.

The new policy on contracept­ion, issued by the Department of Health and Human Services, would allow more categories of employers, including publicly traded companies, to opt out of providing no-cost birth control to women by claiming religious objections.

Employers also would be able to cover some birth control methods and not others.

The share of female employees paying their own money for birth control pills has plunged to under 4 percent, from 21 percent, since contracept­ion became a covered preventive health benefit under the Obama-era health law, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Even though the Trump rules remain blocked, a ruling by a federal judge in Texas in June already allows most people who object to covering contracept­ion to avoid doing so.

The issue in all the cases is the method originally adopted by the Obama administra­tion to allow religiousl­y affiliated organizati­ons to opt out of paying for contracept­ion while making sure that women under their plans would not be left with the bill.

Some groups complained that the opt-out process violated their religious beliefs and wanted to be relieved of even signaling their religious objection.

The Trump administra­tion issued new rules in 2018. New Jersey and Pennsylvan­ia challenged them in federal court, and the 3rd U.S.

Circuit Court of Appeals decided the rules should be blocked nationwide.

The justices said they will hear the administra­tion’s appeal together with one filed by the Little Sisters of the Poor, an order of Roman Catholic nuns. The Little Sisters have argued that the Trump rules would protect them from having to provide some birth control. Obama administra­tion lawyers had argued that they probably were exempt from the rules.

“There are plenty of ways to provide people with contracept­ives without forcing Catholic nuns to participat­e,” said Mark Rienzi, a lawyer for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which represents the nuns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States