Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Preserving the integrity of girls’ sports

- Victor Joecks’ column appears in the Opinion section each Sunday, Wednesday and Friday. Listen to him discuss his columns each Monday at 10 a.m. with Kevin Wall on 790 Talk Now. Contact him at vjoecks@reviewjour­nal.com or 702-383-4698. Follow @victorjoec­k

BOYS shouldn’t be competing in girls’ sports. Somehow that’s become a controvers­ial statement. In 1972, Congress passed Title IX, which led to a massive expansion of girls’ sports. Before Title IX, 295,000 high school girls participat­ed in athletics. Now, it’s more than 2.6 million. The number of female collegiate athletes quintupled.

Biology necessitat­es that girls compete against other girls. After puberty, boys become bigger, stronger and faster than girls. On average, men are taller and have twice as much upper body strength as women and 50 percent more strength in their lower bodies. Men have denser bones than women and greater lung capacity. These physical difference­s give high school boys and men immense advantages in athletics.

Here’s one example. In 1988, Galina Chistyakov­a of the Soviet Union set the women’s world record for the long jump, at just over 24 feet, 8 inches. Last year, five high school boys in the United States jumped a longer distance.

Despite these realities, every Democratic presidenti­al candidate supports allowing biological males to compete with females in high school and collegiate sports. Each candidate has come out in support of the so-called Equality Act, which, despite its name, would make things very unequal for female athletes. The proposal would add “gender identity” to the list of protected characteri­stics under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Last year, every House Democrat voted for this proposal.

If this passed, federal anti-discrimina­tion laws would prevent schools from keeping a biological boy who claims to be a “girl” off the girls’ team. This would grossly unfair to actual girls.

The best weapon supporters of the “Equality” Act have is the media’s willingnes­s to ignore this issue.

“House passes sweeping anti-discrimina­tion bill to expand protection­s of LGBT people,” a CBS headline read. The New York Times told its readers that bill would extend “civil rights protection­s to gay and transgende­r people.” Neither story mentioned that the bill would pave the way for biological males to compete in female sports. Not what comes to mind when someone mentions equality.

It’s almost impossible to overstate how much media bias benefits Democrats. Imagine if the media stopped recycling liberal talking points and featured headlines blasted Democrats for passing a bill that undermines girls’ sports. It’s likely Democrats wouldn’t have voted on it at all, especially knowing it won’t pass the Republican-controlled Senate. If they did, it would be a political albatross for swing district members, such as Rep. Susie Lee.

Some people, including a trans girl running against female track athletes in Connecticu­t, argue girls can defeat biological boys by practicing harder. It’s true that some girls are faster, stronger or more skilled than some boys. But boys still have inherent biological advantages. This is like arguing that because someone taking performanc­e-enhancing drugs doesn’t always win, PEDs aren’t unfair. In some cases, they may not have provided enough of an advantage to guarantee victory, but PEDs do provide an advantage.

Others try to minimize the issue because there are relatively few transgende­r athletes. But it’s still unfair to the girls who have to compete against them. And if this is allowed to continue, you’ll see it happen more and more.

That leads to the final argument. Biological boys who say they’re trans girls are actually girls.

“If you are angry or think it’s ‘unfair’ for a trans girl to beat a cis girl in a sporting event, then fundamenta­lly you don’t think trans girls are ‘real’ girls,” Chase Strangio, deputy director for Ttansgende­r justice with the ACLU, tweeted Monday. “Cis girl” refers to a biological female.

This is the fundamenta­l issue of the transgende­r debate. Many liberals believe you can choose your gender as you choose which sport to play.

The biological advantages boys have in muscle mass, height, bone density and lung capacity, however, aren’t social constructs. They’re the very reason girls needed separate sports teams to start with.

 ?? Pat Eaton-Robb The Associated Press ?? Transgende­r athlete Terry Miller, second from left, wins the final of the 55-meter dash in the 2019 Connecticu­t girls Class S indoor track meet.
Pat Eaton-Robb The Associated Press Transgende­r athlete Terry Miller, second from left, wins the final of the 55-meter dash in the 2019 Connecticu­t girls Class S indoor track meet.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States