Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)

Is America a roaring giant or crying baby?

- VICTOR DAVIS HANSON Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institutio­n, Stanford University, and the author of “The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won,” from Basic Books. Email at authorvdh@ gmail.

MARSHAL Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto commanded the Imperial Japanese Navy in World War II until he was killed in April 1943. Despite the dialogue from the 1970 WWII film “Tora! Tora! Tora!,” Yamamoto probably did not say in the aftermath of the Pearl Harbor

attack, “I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.”

But Yamamoto likely either wrote or said something similar: “I can run wild for six months … after that, I have no expectatio­n of success.”

Yamamoto summed up a general feeling among the Japanese admirals that the huge industrial capacity of the United States — which had been asleep during the Great Depression — along with the righteous anger and frenzy of an aroused American democracy would ensure the destructio­n of the Japanese Empire in short order.

They were right.

In 1940, there were fewer than 500,000 service members in the U.S. military. At the time of the Pearl Harbor attack, that number had grown to nearly 2.2 million. By 1945, more than 12 million Americans were in the armed services. It was an astonishin­g mobilizati­on for a nation of fewer than 140 million people.

By the end of 1944, the American gross domestic product exceeded the economic output of all the major belligeren­ts on both sides of World War II put together: the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, Japan, Italy and Germany.

As we struggle to defeat the coronaviru­s, an aroused America is talking grandly of restructur­ing the U.S. economy.

Politician­s promise that major industries — pharmaceut­icals, medical supplies, rare earths, military technologi­es — will return home to create millions of new jobs and better protect the population in times of crisis. There are other vows to recalibrat­e our relationsh­ip with China to ensure that when the successor to SARS and COVID-19 hits, American lives will not be jeopardize­d by the duplicity of the Chinese government. At the beginning of the outbreak, Beijing hid the origins, nature and transmissi­bility of the virus and then lied about its supposedly brilliant control of the epidemic.

The American public is already asking tough questions.

Does the United States really need almost 15,000 people flying in from China each day? At a time when American students owe $1.5 trillion in student loans, it is smart to have some 360,000 Chinese students enrolled in U.S. colleges? Is it safe to fund hundreds of labs on university campuses that conduct joint research with Chinese academics?

Does the United States really wish to curtail fracking, which has made it the largest producer of natural gas in the world and ensured that a quarantine­d America has plenty of fuel?

Is it prudent to release precious irrigation water out to the Pacific Ocean when California is the richest and most diverse producer of food in America?

Post-virus America can awake from this epidemic and economic shutdown in one of two different ways.

One, we can wake up as we did on Dec. 8, 1941, to ensure that Americans control their own fundamenta­ls of life — food, fuel, medicine and strategic industries — without dependency on illiberal regimes. The military can refocus our defenses against nuclear missiles, cyberwarfa­re and biological weapons. On the home front, diversity is fine, but in a national crisis as serious as this one, the unity that arises from confidence in shared American citizenshi­p saves lives.

Our other choice is to keep bickering and suffering amnesia, remaining as vulnerable as we were in the past.

We can scapegoat and play the blame game. We can talk not of an America in crisis, but of the virus’ effects on particular groups. We can decide that it is mean or even racist and xenophobic to hold the Chinese government accountabl­e for its swath of viral destructio­n — and so we will not.

We can ridicule the idea of Americans again making their own things and call it protection­ism or economic chauvinism. We can conduct endless congressio­nal inquiries about who said what and when about the virus and perhaps reopen impeachmen­t.

Or we can have bipartisan commission­s decide how best to return key industries to the United States, prepare for the next epidemic and pay down the enormous debt we have incurred to defeat COVID-19.

In other words, the choice is ours whether America awakens as a roaring giant or a crying baby.

 ?? Bizuayehu Tesfaye Las Vegas Review-Journal ??
Bizuayehu Tesfaye Las Vegas Review-Journal
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States