Las Vegas Review-Journal (Sunday)
Former bank robber Jon Ponder is waiting for a presidential pardon.
Reformed bank robber garnered Trump praise
WASHINGTON — In February, when President Donald Trump addressed a ceremony for Hope for Prisoners graduates in Las Vegas, he mused about pardoning former adviser Roger Stone, who had just been sentenced to 40 months in prison, and former bank robber Jon Ponder, who had turned his life around and founded the ministry to help inmates re-enter society.
Trump explained that he didn’t want to use his pardon power for Stone because he thought his former adviser might be exonerated. But he was tempted to give a “full pardon” to Ponder, who had served his time in prison, as the president talked about redemption and the American belief in second chances.
On July 10, Trump commuted Stone’s sentence just before his longtime friend — convicted on seven counts of lying to Congress, tampering with a witness and obstructing a House investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election — was set to go to prison.
Meanwhile, Ponder is still waiting for a pardon that would recognize his personal transformation and restore his rights, such as the right to own a gun, which are taken away even after a federal sentence is served.
For his part, Ponder already completed multiple state prison sentences and federal time for armed robbery.
In March, the Nevada Pardons Board unanimously issued a pardon for domestic battery crimes for which he was convicted and served time in the 1990s and early 2000s, after Ponder’s brother, Darryl, a victim in one of the battery cases, spoke of how Ponder’s transformation had “brought the family together.”
Come a long way
A presidential pardon for a 2004 federal conviction for the armed robbery would mean recognition of Ponder’s rehabilitation and release him from restrictions that apply to offenders with federal felony convictions.
After his state pardon, Ponder attorney Kristina Wildeveld told the Review-Journal that without a federal pardon, Ponder is still subject to limits that impinge on even his personal relationships.
“He can’t go into his daughters’ schools. He cannot accompany his daughters on his daughters’ school field trips,” Wildeveld said. “He cannot be fully involved in his children’s lives.”
Ponder attended a Rose Garden event celebrating the National Day of Prayer in May 2018. Seated next to the Black ex-prisoner was Richard Beasley, a white retired FBI agent — and the man who had arrested Ponder in 2004 for bank robbery. The two credit their shared faith for an unlikely friendship.
After Ponder was convicted, his then-girlfriend gave Beasley a package with a tie and a thank-you note for the agent’s gentlemanly behavior.
When Ponder got out of prison and entered a halfway house, Beasley, now president of private investigation firm Global Intelligence Network, was there.
Ponder worked for a year-and-a-half for a moving company before he started Hope for Prisoners, which works to help criminal offenders re-enter society with the help of law enforcement personnel, the faith community and employers.
Pardons for well-connected?
The Review-Journal asked White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany whether Ponder would receive a pardon soon, in light of Trump’s Las Vegas remarks, and whether the president’s tendency to grant clemency idiosyncratically mainly benefits well-connected people.
“I have no update on Jon Ponder,” McEnany responded. “It’s absolutely not the case that only those who are politically connected get a pardon. This president is the president of criminal justice reform. This president did the First Step Act. This president has fought for those who are given unduly harsh sentences” more than any Democrat who talks about the issue.
Ponder has not applied for a pardon through the usual channel, a petition with the pardon attorney’s office in the Department of Justice.
Trump, however, has the unfettered power to grant a pardon to any federal offender.
Former prisoners can apply through the Justice Department or White House back channels, although the Department of Justice tends to look for former offenders who recognize their guilt and the fairness of their punishment, while Trump prefers to show mercy to individuals who are looking for relief because they believe the justice system treated them unfairly.